A Review of Part VII of Ron Paul's "Pillars of Prosperity"

Dr. Ron Paul has published a new book this year,must inflate the money supply, taxes increase during
entitled "Pillars of Prosperity: Free Markets, Honestwartime, and deficits skyrocket. But even in the
Money, Private Property," which contains anwaging of the war, all of these extra funds get sent
extensive compilation of his thoughts on economicsoverseas, which creates the desire for certain
and presents an excellent opportunity for a specialsegments of the US economy for protectionist
book review. This the first installment of a longerpolicies and tariffs. The government also grows
review of the entire book, the full review of whichduring war, with a corresponding loss of civil liberties
will examine each individual part of the book andfor the people.
present a summary of the positions and argumentsBut sanctions, even when they do not lead directly
presented, which have been woefullyto war, have extremely negative effects on the
underrepresented to most Americans. "Part 7 -economies of both countries who are parties to the
International Affairs" is discussed here.sanctions. In addition to costing jobs and hurting the
This section is really a continuation of the previouspeople of the nations, sanctions also cause the
discussions on free trade and managed trade by thepeople to back dictatorial leaders who would not
international bureaucrats. Instead of a more generalhave popular support if sanctions were not imposed.
overview of what free trade consists of, Ron PaulAs well, they hurt American businesses that have
spends more time looking at specific institutions andmarkets closed to them by government fiat, not by
policies that undermine trade, such as thethe working of the free market.
International Monetary Fund, World Bank, WorldBesides the US government's involvement in this
Trade Organization the American practice of givingwhole charade, there are a host of
direct foreign aid to other countries, deservedly orextra-government agencies who also participate. The
not. He has consistently argued that US foreign policyWorld Trade Organization, despite its stated benefits,
is often a choice between countries obeying the USdoes not promote free trade and it attacks
government and receiving generous aid packages, orAmerican sovereignty. According to Paul, membership
becoming the target of economic sanctions and war.in the organization is illegal, as the government is
The practice of giving out American taxpayer moneybound by WTO decisions and obligated to change
to foreign nations has been a complete failure,laws that the WTO panels deem necessary. Likewise,
according to Paul. Although it is meant to prop upthe Export-Import Bank subsidizes the main
socialist governments or to be used in the support ofcompetitors of American business, with China
their economies, the aid only promotes the statusreceiving more aid than any other country. The World
quo, while taking money from poor Americans toBank, as well, promotes state-run corporate
give to the rich elite in poor, Third World Nations. Thiscapitalism by lending money to Third World dictators
helps neither Americans nor people living in foreignwho steal the money, run off, and leave the people
countries.to pay the bills, which they are frequently unable to
Not surprisingly, though, the entire concept of foreigndo.
aid is sold to Americans as helping them, as well asHowever, it is the International Monetary Fund that
helping poor people in poor countries. For example,draws most of Paul's ire in this part of the book. Just
Plan Colombia and its successors have been solda few of the ills of the system he mentions include
throughout the years to the American people asthe IMF's promotion of worldwide inflation, foreign aid
fighting the "War on Drugs" and the "War on Terror."to insolvent nations, and the fact that membership in
In fact, though, the real purpose is to provide athe Fund specifically forbids countries from linking
subsidy to the Colombian government and US oiltheir currency to gold. Although its stated purpose
companies to protect their pipelines from damage inwas to provide reserves to solve international
the civil war that has been going on in the countrypayment problems, the IMF instead creates liquidity
for decades.throughout the world, facilitating a transfer of wealth
Foreign aid also helps these poor countries cover upin the form of subsidies to Third World socialists and
the weaknesses in their economies and weakens theFirst World banks. As Paul states, "By creating added
American economy. Paul writes that "foreignliquidity, the IMF can indeed redistribute wealth, but it
government welfare, and there is no better name forcannot create new wealth."
it, takes money out of the productive sectors of theThus, billions of dollars from the IMF goes to large
economy - the paychecks of middle-class Americansinternational banks and when the loans to the poor
- to reward economic mismanagement and politicalnations go bad, the American taxpayer is left with
corruption." The foreign governments are able to putthe bill. According to Paul, "the IMF forces American
the aid money in sectors that would not be able totaxpayers to subsidize large, multinational corporations
compete in a free market, and this fostersand underwrite economic destruction around the
corporatism. Businesses can ally themselves with theglobe." This is despite the fact that the institution has
government and receive the international welfareover 100 million ounces of gold on reserve and no
from the US politicians. This obviously leads to thereason to burden taxpayers; when their programs go
political corruption that is endemic in Third Worldunder water, the bureaucrats appeal to the US
nations that receive foreign aid, with families andgovernment for more money to bail out the banks
cronies of the leaders setting up shell businesses andthat made the bad loans.
absconding with the aid money.But this possibility of receiving a bailout courtesy of
Even though most countries do not benefit from USthe American people goes a long way to creating the
foreign aid, refusing to do as the governmentmoral hazards that make the collapses a certainty.
instructs results in even more serious consequences,Banks know there will be no consequences for their
usually in the form of economic sanctions, such aspoor lending decisions, so they keep investing in bad
are on Cuba and Iran and were on Iraq during thesectors of poor economies, and the recipient
1990's. As he states, "Congress passes legislationcountries of IMF funds end up with huge amounts of
calling for regime change, sanctions are imposed, andunserviceable debt. These very conditions were seen
eventually we are told that only an attack will solvein the failure in Argentina and the 1997 Asia crisis,
the problem." According to Paul, this act is just onewhen numerous countries' currencies' values dropped
half-step short of war and will usually lead to war,dramatically in the space of weeks or months.
with Iraq being the most obvious example ofThe cost and problems associated with these
sanctions that failed to depose the dictator, causedinternational policies, according to Paul, far outweigh
tremendous damage to the people of the nation, andany supposed benefits received by the American
led to an undeclared, no-win war in the Middle East.government or taxpayers. In fact, many of the
Paul argues against both foreign aid and sanctions forpolicies only create more problems that the
their propensity to lead to war, which has far morebureaucrats will then feel the need to step in and
negative consequences to the American people and"solve" with more of the same solutions that caused
economy. To finance the wars, the governmentthe original problem.