America's Schizophrenia - Why Immigration is Besides the Point

It is certainly no wonder that there is sharp divisionnot only tolerates, but requires illegal immigrants. We
and controversy in this Country on the subject ofhave a minimum wage system, a labor union
immigration. After all, the American attitude on thestructure and laws which, while certainly desirable in
subject is conducive to mixed emotions which, in thismany respects to American Labor, has made us, in
writer's opinion, rise to the level of schizophrenia. Thislarge measure, unable to compete in a global
phenomenon is hardly new, although a superficialeconomy. Hence, the ever-increasing export of jobs
survey of current punditry would have us believeoverseas. This is why, when one calls Microsoft Tech
that this whole subject has risen to publicSupport, he or she is connected to someone in India.
consciousness only in the past few months.The cost of employment in the U.S. mandates, in
In the middle of the 19th Century, a huge wave ofpractice, though technically contrary to law, that a
Irish immigration, fleeing the potato famine, arrived atcheap labor pool be available for low-end, unskilled
our shores. Americans of Anglo-Saxon origins werework. Although it is often said that illegal immigrants
very resentful, and frightened about the prospect ofare doing jobs that Americans won't do, I do not
lost jobs. Sound familiar? Those of Anglo-Saxon originreally thing that that is necessarily true; rather, the
had, of course, themselves been immigrants not socost of having American citizens do those jobs would
very long before. The Irish immigrants, quickly founddrive up prices in certain areas, such as manufactured
a niche for themselves, and acquired political clout. Sogoods and agricultural products, to a level which
when Eastern European Jews, Italians and SlavsAmericans would find intolerable.
arrived in the late 19th and Early 20th Centuries, theThus, even if it were practical to deport 11 million
Irish were in a position to resent those new arrivals,illegal immigrants, I believe that such a move would
and did so quite vociferously.seriously threaten the viability of the real economy
"Give us your tired, your poor...?" Nice words, to be(i.e., the one we don't admit to) of the United States.
sure, but rarely meant by the entrenched AmericanThe proposed alternative is to find a way to bring
populace.these immigrants into the mainstream, and to give
Then, as now, it was the immigration of peoplethem, ultimately, the opportunity to become legal,
seeking opportunity which, in large measure, gave ourtaxpaying citizens. The flaw in this, of course, is
country the energy and vibrancy which built it into aobvious. Once these illegal immigrants become legal,
mammoth industrial and economic machine. Now, wethey will, among other things, have to be paid the
are hotly debating the issue of immigration onceminimum wage, and the entire benefit that we
again, with both sides of the question asserting validsurreptitiously and hypocritically derive from our
points in support of their respective positions. I wouldunderground, illegal workforce will be lost to us.
argue that, at the end of the day, a compromiseUltimately, therefore, the problem is not immigration.
somewhat in the nature of that proposed by theIt is, regrettably, a much larger and more difficult one.
President is inevitable, but hardly sufficient to addressHow do we compete? We cannot produce goods as
the real and much more fundamental problem thatcheaply as India or China. We cannot impose
we face. It is, rather, roughly analogous to "shiftingpunishing trade tariffs, because that just invites
the deck chairs on the Titanic."reciprocation, and black marketeering. America, I
It is certainly true, as argued by the "seal thebelieve, is in serious danger of losing its preeminent
borders" constituency, that, while we want toposition on the world's economic stage. As it stands
encourage immigration, it should be legal immigration.today, our only remaining and potent weapon is our
People have been following the rules, and waitingseemingly insatiable consumer market. We need our
their turn, pursuing the right to enter into and work ineconomic gurus to figure out ways to leverage that
this Country and to become citizens, according to theinto rewarding our friends and penalizing those who
laws enacted for that purpose. Why, the argumentwould bury us as an international economic power.
goes, should people who snuck over the border andThere is no time to lose. And while sealing borders on
who have not been paying taxes, and have beenthe one hand, or creating the illusion of a country
receiving public benefits, schooling, etc., be permitteddedicated, on a renewed basis, to opportunity for
to "jump the line."? A very valid point, to be sure.the dispossessed may make us feel good for awhile,
This Country has a strong interest in enforcement ofneither of these paths will solve the real problem. We
its laws and, equally importantly, an interest in beingare victims of our own success and prosperity, and
seen to enforce its laws.the rest of the world wants what we have. If we
It is also true, however, that as a result of thedon't protect it, it will surely be taken from us, and
confluence of intermittent enforcement ofsoon.
immigration policy coupled with labor policy, ourWarren R.
American Economy is now based on a system which