China Suppliers Up Ante on Product Safety

Following a series of tighter consumer protectionenforcement deadlines."
laws, makers are emphasizing product safety whileBut for small and midsize factories that have less
contending with the high cost of compliance.capital to invest in equipment and prohibitive testing
Faced with stricter safety regulations in key exportfees, conformance can be a daunting task.
destinations, companies in China are allocating moreTesters can also be partners
resources to product testing and emphasizingThe professional testing industry is booming amid the
high-quality materials despite the pressure these arerising safety trend. With the increased need for
putting on manufacturing outlay.product evaluation, the past few years have seen an
For most suppliers, adopting complicated andinflux and expansion of third-party laboratories in
far-reaching directives is not the main challenge, butChina, including SGS, TUV, BV, Morlab and Pony Test.
the high expense of compliance is.These organizations also provide free training on the
Many of the new safety standards require makers tolatest regulations, and inform companies on which
conduct more tests on a greater number of chemicalmerchandise needs testing and how.
substances. As a result, certification fees for someRegulatory agencies in the US and the EU have
products have risen by as much as 50 percent, andlikewise been active in helping suppliers get up to
even doubled in a few cases. CPSIA evaluation forspeed.
toys, for example, can cost up to $1,000 per modelWorkshops on the new EU Toy Safety Directive
depending on the complexity of the design.have been organized, with the support of the
The average toy company now spends $60,000 toEU-China Trade Project and the Directorate-General
$100,000 on examination fees every year. One offor Enterprise and Industry of the European
the biggest toy makers in China pays more than $2.9Commission.
million annually on testing, much higher than the yearlyIn October 2009, the third CPSC-AQSIQ Summit was
revenue of small suppliers.held in Wuxi, Jiangsu province. With a theme of
Lamp specialist Heshan Mingkeda Industries Co. Ltd"promoting best practices by Chinese manufacturers
spends about $3,000 for SAA certification alone,and US importers to maximize product safety", the
which takes one or two months to acquire, accordingsummit was attended by CPSC chair Inez
to the company's sales manager Mini Yip.Tenenbaum.
In many instances, fulfilling safety requirementsIn her keynote address, Tenenbaum reported that in
involves replacing infringing materials with compliantfiscal year 2009, toy recalls went down to 40 from
substitutes.more than 80 in the preceding period. The
Suppliers of food-grade products, for instance, haveinformation exchange between the CPSC and AQSIC
already stopped using BPA, an organic compoundabout recalls of China-made goods was emphasized,
found in many plastics. In a range of consumeras well as the need for frequent training sessions.
goods, further modifications include the shift fromThe AQSIQ has been educating China toy makers
PVC to POE, and from PC to phthalate-free PES,about safety requirements in the US and on
glass and nontoxic silicone.strengthening quality controls. The CPSC has arranged
Battery makers are striving to develop or sourceto set up an office at the US embassy in Beijing to
safer anode and cathode materials. Some have begunhelp promote compliance with US standards among
to replace conventional lithium cobalt oxidelocal suppliers.
formulation with lithium iron phosphate, an alternativeLocal governments and trade organizations are also
with lower environmental impact. Other efforts arevigorously pushing companies to bolster the image of
aimed at improving protection against overcharging,"made in China" products.
discharging and heating.At the Canton Fair last fall, the Ministry of Commerce
But in most instances, "safe" alternatives are costlierdistributed export quality and safety manual to
than the originals. 3P PVC for instance, is 30 percentexhibitors.
more expensive than regular PVC but is 30 percentOrganizations such as the China Council for the
cheaper than 6P.Promotion of International Trade have been
Similarly, A5-grade melamine goes for $2,200 per ton,sponsoring seminars for business owners and local
three times as much as the same volume of thegovernment officials on product safety in Southern
A1-grade variant at about $735.China.
In some cases, imported materials, which invariablyRegulations getting tougher
cost more, are favored over domestic equivalents.The safety bar that China suppliers must hurdle is
Imported PP, for instance, is 20 to 30 percent highergetting higher by the year as new international and
than domestic versions, at $1,800 to $2,100 per ton.domestic standards are put into place.
Overseas-sourced organic fabrics, likewise, are 20 toIn December 2009, the European Chemicals Agency
30 percent more expensive than local variants.announced the addition of 15 chemicals to its
Despite the high outlay, some companies prefer tocandidate list of substances of very high concern
source abroad for consistent quality. Foshan Geuwa(SVHC) under REACH. Among the inclusions were
Electric Appliance Co. Ltd sources 80 percent ofdiisobutyl phthalate, a commonly used plasticizer, and
materials and components for its blenders and juicerslead chromate, a coloring agent.
overseas, while the rest are purchased locally.REACH has wide-ranging impact in the EU as it
Besides higher raw material expenses, makers haverequires disclosure of information on hazardous
to contend with increases in indirect costs, particularlysubstances contained in every product. The directive
those related with monitoring the supply chain tois on top of specific regulations such as RoHS for
ensure that all manufacturing inputs meetelectronic goods, EN 71 for toys, and Regulation 1905
specifications.2004/EC for materials that come in contact with
According to Tim Corrigan, president and CEO of thefood.
Quality Assurance Institute, "The root cause of theFor toy makers, the CPSIA/HR4040 in the US and
problem (of product quality) is control of the rawthe EU's New Toy Safety Directive or 2009/48/EC
material, application contaminations and subfactories.amend existing rules substantially and impose greater
To fix this requires an overhaul at many factories.restrictions on suspicious chemicals. The latter
The solution calls for significant transparency, diligenceregulation limits 19 metallic elements. It also bans 55
and dedication."fragrant substances and warns against a further 11
Generally, material vendors are able to offertypes.
third-party certification. But for those that cannot doOther baby and children's products and toys must
so, companies need to send their own QC staff topass the standards for EN 71, CE, WEEE and EMC in
supervise the production at the material suppliers'the EU, ASTM-F963, CPSIA, FDA and UL in the US,
factories.AS/NZS/ISO 8124 in Australia and New Zealand, and
More exporters are now limiting their sourcing toST2002 in Japan.
suppliers that can provide certified inputs. Still,Following the US and EU's lead, Japan, Australia and
collection and documentation of every componenteven Malaysia are modifying their existing toy safety
utilized requires time, effort and money.regulations, particularly on flammability and the use of
In addition to testing and materials quality,phthalates and lead.
manufacturers are also enhancing their in-house QCLithium battery exporters have to comply with
facilities.UL1642 for cells and UL2054 or FCC for battery
Lai On Products (Industrial) Ltd, a Hong Kong-ownedpacks in addition to EMC and RoHS. Designs shipped
maker of crayons, modeling clay and paint has set upby air are also obligated to undergo UN38.3 testing. In
a microbiological laboratory at its factory in Shenzhen,markets where FCC, UL and RoHS approval are not
Guangdong province. Certified by the China Nationalnecessary, passing the UN38.3 is sufficient.
Accreditation Service for Conformity Assessment,For products that come in contact with food,
the lab is comparable to a chemical-testing facility.companies have to comply with assorted standards
The supplier also sends its products to third-partysuch as UL, CB, CE, GS, ETL, CCC, FDA and LFGB.
agencies to ensure compliance with ASTM D-4236Most EU countries recognize Germany's LFGB
and F963, Toxicological Risk Assessment, EN 71,because of its stricter requirements.
CPSIA, California Proposition 65 and REACHAside from international regulations, suppliers have to
requirements.follow domestic guidelines for a number of goods.
Some baby stroller factories are now equipped withGarment trimming makers, for example, need to
wheel performance, dynamic durability andcomply with three sets of requirements for cords
drop-testing facilities. At the same time, manyand drawstrings to be used in children's clothing.
stuffed toys and children's garments makers areIssued by the General Administration of Quality
purchasing more needle detectors.Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine, and
Any measure to comply with safety regulationsStandardization Administration, the GB/T 22702-2008,
undoubtedly adds to the cost of production. Suppliers22704-2008 and 22705-2008 are based on US' ASTM
estimate material and certification expenses haveF 1816-97(2004), the UK's BS 7907:1997 and EN
risen about 10 percent in recent months. Many14682:2007, respectively.
companies try to absorb the additional expenditure,In addition, some existing national standards for
but this is not always feasible.trimmings have been revised and now have
While investment in facilities can be recovered in theprovisions that monitor and prescribe allowable levels
long term, the same cannot be said about testingfor harmful substances that are even lower than
fees. When order quantities are low, as in the currentEuropean regulations. The GB/T 17592, for example,
environment, makers are often unable to recoverkeeps azo content at 20mg/kg whereas it is 30mg
money spent on certification of specific models.kg in the EU's EN 14362.
Shorter product life cycles due to fast-changingLikewise, the China government issued a new
customer preferences also give manufacturers astandard for melamine-formaldehyde products used
narrower time frame to recoup compliance outlay.as food containers and packaging materials. This
Some suppliers try to negotiate bigger orders or askcomes after several foreign markets banned low-end
buyers to shoulder the cost for certification. Butmodels due to potential chemical leaching.
clients are averse to both options in view of theThe regulation seeks to ensure safety by prohibiting
current economic conditions.the use of urea formaldehyde resin as the main
Typically, tier 1 manufacturers are able to complymaterial. A1 and A3-grade melamine dinnerware
with regulations more seamlessly due mainly to theirpieces, which contain 70 to 90 percent of this
stable financial resources.substance, tend to melt at high temperatures and
"Enterprises that cater to major OEM customersmay cause a health hazard.
likewise have the easiest time adjusting to the newTo ensure compliance with the safety code, the
rules as they have better access to information," saidgovernment has required suppliers to obtain a
Cody Wang, chemical testing deputy generalproduction license from the General Administration of
manager at Intertek. "They are usually able to makeQuality Supervision, Inspection & Quarantine.
the necessary changes months in advance of