Development Aid Causes More Harm Than Good

Nowadays, everything is money, nothing is free. Aaggressive attacks on their own citizens and their
person cannot proper in today's free market withoutenemies, which increase political domination and
having financial assets. Most activities of these daystotalitarian regimes. For example, Rwanda, Angola,
are embedded to trade, as such; free trade impactsSomalia, Sudan and Congo are among many recipient
every aspects of life. Although societies have tradednations that experienced devastated impacts.
for thousands of years, the last 35 years is anThe last form of foreign aid is development aid. It is
explosion in international trade. In 1970, the value ofthe most talked-about and controversial one
world export of goods and services amounted to 0.4compared to the other two. Development aid intends
trillion dollars, which is about a quarter of worldto improve livelihood of people in poor countries by
output. Globalists believe the recent multinationaleradicating absolute poverty through Millennium
trade agreements and technological advances thatDevelopment Goals (MDGs), building good governance
reduce time and cost of transportation have actualthrough democratization, encouraging participatory
resulted to economic growth and prosperity, and theinitiatives through Non Governmental Organizations
overall development of all nations around the world.(NGOs), preserving human rights by enforcing
They are pratically right, but ethically wrong.activism, establishing global partnership through
The free market economy of recent days hassolidarity and volunteerism, and eliminating inequality
increased inequality between developed andthrough fair redistribution of the scarce resources
underdeveloped countries, donor and recipienteffectively and efficiently.
nations, rich and poor people, men and women,Indeed, there are unnecessary human suffering in
dominant and subordinated groups, etc. Since thethird world countries that requires the attention and
relationship between aid donor and recipient nationsassistance of rich nations. For example, Children's lives
depends upon the radical interest of profitcould be saved with less than a dollar malaria
maximization, most poor countries tend to relytreatment cost if aid money is well managed without
heavily on the support of rich countries in order tocorruption and allocation inefficiency. For instead, a
implement development programs. Most of thetotal of more 20 billion dollars is being sent every
development projects are directly influenced by theyear to Africa by official aid agencies around the
donor's interest such that they do not account forworld but millions of children in Africa have lost lives
values of recipient nations.from a preventable and curable disease like malaria
Most donor nations use foreign aid as a vehicle tobecause the money intended for them are being
reach their private interests; they do not care aboutmisused and mismanaged by corrupt and
improving environmental quality and building aincompetent leaders. Development aid to Africa
sustainable development. For instead, a lot of the aidwould have made a difference if it was directed for
money meant for the most desperate people inintended purposes.
Africa is not being spent with accountability.The United States (U.S) alone has spent more than
Therefore, it is important to analyze the nature of60 billion dollars in development aid to Africa within
free trade and development aid by identifying whothe past 45 years. Donor nations like U.S are kept
loses and who gains in it. As most scholars wouldpouring aid money without making pertinent changes
agree, rich people are obviously getting richer at theto development policies on the ground although most
expenses of poor people as have capital to investof the annual development reports are showing more
and power to utilize in a completive market.failure than success. One would wonder as to
Consequently, the gap between poor and rich peoplewhether the donors are really walking to walk
has widened today than ever before. Therefore,whenever they promise to alleviate poverty and
development aid is increasing exploitation, dominationincrease economic growth by assisting poor countries.
and distortion of economic, social and politicalIt is obvious that the relationship between donors
relationship throughout the world because it benefitsand recipients is not about sustainable development
donor nations and ruling elites in recipient countries atat all but it is all about business. Donor nations engage
the expense of the poor people in rural areas.in providing aid money because they want to
There are couples of misconceptions about aid thatmaintain their business relationship with the recipient
need to be clarified. First of all, aid is not free. It is anations so that they can exploit valuable natural
soft loan with a concessional rate that is given byresources. For example, the relationship between U.S
self-centered donors to corrupt recipientand Sierra Leona is all about economic interests. The
governments. Secondly, aid money is being firstU.S gains more money by providing aid money to
spent in donor nations before it reaches recipientSierra Leona where it explore and import diamonds.
nations. For example, the Canadian aid to Africa isFurthermore, development funds are given in the
first spent in Canada on Canadian food suppliers,hands of corrupt ruling elites in poor countries who
contractors, drug companies, and many others. It iscare about nothing other than their personal interests.
clear that donor nations benefit from aid more thanBesides, the elites are members of well-off urban
recipient nations.communities. Hence, they are not the legitimate
Foreign aid is channelled through individuals, privatepeople to request and receive aid money because
business organizations, and public aid agencies. Therethey do not need help. Besides, they have little
are three forms of aid; humanitarian, military andknowledge about the needs of poor rural population.
development aid. Humanitarian aid is the only one thatFor example, some aid money is requested to
benefits recipients more than donors. It is intended topurchase trackers for agricultural development
alleviate human suffering, save lives, protect humanalthough the poor people do not even know how to
dignity and preserve future. Since this kind of aid isdrive truckers. They only use only simple tools such
being sent during international emergence such asas hoes and Pagers for cultivating food crops for
famine, drought, epidemics, etc. Thus, it is effective,survival. Thus, they need to have the freedom to
efficient and transparent through news media as itdesign and deliver development programs relevant to
flows in the form of logistical relief like food items,their issues.
tents, etc, but not in money form. For example, theSince most governments of poor countries are more
aid to Haiti is humanitarian aid that intends to makecentralized, the preliminary development goals should
immediate results.be decentralizing feudal power by organizing local
The second form of foreign aid is military aid. Militarycommunities to take charge and destiny of their
aid to developing countries has created wars, sociallocalities. Decentralized government can make decision
unrest, corruption, and state terrorism. This kind ofmaking process democratic and inclusive where
aid is sent by mostly western allies of recipientmarginalized groups and communities can have voice.
nations in third world. It flows in the form of eitherOnce this is successfully achieved, and then a
equipments like guns or money to purchase them.participatory development can be instated so that
Most recipient nations of such aid tend to use it foreveryone will have part to play.