Enterprising Entrepreneurship in Legal Profession - Mergers & Acquisition

Conventionally a lawyer or a legal practitioner is ansatisfaction.
individual certified to give legal advice and toCreation of transnational law firm by merger involves
represent clients in disputes before the courts. Thesynergizing of different working cultures. The
practice of lawyers advising businesses in deals andAmerican law firms are bred in a more competitive
transactions and in complying with law to preemptand aggressive market oriented approaches than the
litigation in future is in historical perspective fairlyfirms in Britain and India. Thus it is pertinent that
recent. With the creation of business conglomeratesthere is a wavelength and consonance of thoughts,
the concept of offering one-stop shop for differentwherein all the major partners are willing to
legal areas evolved and so did the institution of lawcompromise and adhere to a challenging future and
firms. In the 21st century with globalization being thethe opportunity of doing cross-border transnational
mantra for transnational business transactions thedeals by creating a global entity. They have to realize
evolution of law firms having offices in multiplethat the merged entity will be penetrating into
geographical locations has facilitated the formation ofdifferent areas and this will help them build a stronger
International law firms. Cross-border consolidation ofrelationship with their transnational and multi-product
legal business is occurring as evidenced byinstitutional clients. The individuals in many cases have
convergence of law firms vide international mergers,to rise to the occasion and have the ability to think
multi-national firms and international law firmof building a bigger brand. It is significant for the
networks. Multi-national practices offer newpartners to convince their clients that the emergence
opportunities to serve foreign clients.of the new entity will be of benefit to them too. The
General practice firms in major markets areuse of technology to conduct conflict checks and to
increasingly feeling that 150-300 lawyers is onlytake away this power from the partners has to be
mid-sized, both from the perspective of clients andhandled tactfully but assertively. The top to bottom
recruits. Consequently, many of these firms arereview of the firm's management structure has to be
exploring expansion opportunities. Many followbuilt and at times the managing partner has to
aggressive and at times predatory M&Aintrospect if he has the ability and the tools to handle
techniques for their expansion and growth. The USthe pressures of the new job.
and UK led firms have laid a pioneering and innovativeThe downside of such mergers is that there will be
benchmarks and industry standards on building anddrop-off referrals from other firms, which will have
managing large scale law firms.concerns of handling clients over to a major
Today the transnational law firms have businesscompetitor. Tremendous efforts have to be made to
turnover running into hundreds of million dollars andbuild relationships and mutual trust between partners
are managed in a professional manner like anyof different branches and locations so as to boost
Fortune 500 corporations. Many of them hire topinternal client referrals.
class accountants and MBAs to keep abreast withThere is one area of concern if such mergers are to
the latest management and financial techniques inbe incorporated in different cultural settings. When
constant effort to build a sound 'brand' name andthe merger happens between firms of Europe and
create an effective and positive 'value position'. SinceAmerica there is not much differentiation in working
the U.S. Supreme Court's holding in Bates v. Arizonaculture and in dollar-euro exchange rates. But it will be
(1977) wherein the prohibition on commerciala challenging issue, when an International Law firm
advertising of attorneys was lifted, the American lawwould like to do an acquisition in a country like India,
firms have made substantial budgetary allocations forwhere the billing is significantly different than the
advertising like any other business corporations.ones adapted by the transnational law firms. The
As the size and complexity of the mergernumber of Indian law firms that work on the hourly
transactions increases, a premium needs to be placedbillable cycle are handful whereas that is the norm
on both effective evaluation and implementation ofwith the International law firms. The strong sustained
the merger. Merger discussions can place stress ongrowth of the Indian economy and the appetite of
both individuals and organizations. There are fewIndian businesses to make a presence in the global
changes in a law firm that are as dramatic as atrade is compelling many International law firms to
merger. The key to managing this change is planning,have a "India Group" practice vertical as at present
structure and communication. It is pertinent to keepthey are not allowed to set up practices in India. But
in mind that the legal profession is a service sectorwith India being signatory to General Agreement on
and its brand is nothing but the 'value' that eachTrade in Services (GATS), it is inevitable that the
'individual' attorney brings to it. Also the valuation ofservice sector in India will be liberalized. Today the
the firms is done on the strength of what each ofInternational law firms and multinational companies
the partner can bring to his practice vertical. Thus if arefer businesses to different local law firms, but like it
few individual attorneys leave the firm, the brand ofhas happened in the advertising and consulting
the firm can be diminished exponentially. This aspectbusiness most of the multinational companies would
makes the legal business (It could include any otherlike to relocate their work to a one-stop shop and
service industry (like consulting, softwarethis might fuel the appetite for mergers among law
development and accounting), but for the purpose offirms.
this discussion I am only focusing on law firms.)From the perspective of Indian Law firms, the
different from other sectors. Consequent to aconventional wisdom is that young firms are not very
merger between different firms for a partner at anlikely to be targets for a merger or acquisition. But in
individual level is that it changes the remunerationIndia the concept of law firm as a professional
policies, lines of authority and the bonus &business entity has acquired significance only since
retirement benefits. But at the professional level,the 1990s. Hence if a firm has built up its
what is considered and vigorously debated is how toorganizational structure and its reputation, the
synergize the strengths and weaknesses of eachlikelihood of its being acquired becomes more likely.
firm and whether the firms are culturally compatible.Indian firms with strong domestic and cross border
Another significant issue which hovers overpractice may find themselves inundated with offers.
M&A in law firms is of compensation amongThe greater challenge for an International law firm will
partners of the firm. Generally two systems arebe its ability to keep profits per equity partner high
followed- traditional lockstep method and the moreand to pay partners in remote locations based on the
competitive scheme of getting a share of incomelocal billing which may not match the lucrative billing of
from ones business generation, generally known asbigger commercial cities. This will be a key element
the eat-what-you-kill-scheme. Lockstep is a systemfor effectuating acquisitions in different countries.
for paying partners according to how long they haveThese were the issues that led to the collapse of
been in the partnership irrespective of their personalCoudert Brothers, a firm with strong fundamentals,
contributions to the growth of the business of thewhich expanded by not laying enough focus on
firm. Lawyers in the partnership for three years, fordeveloping strong domestic core practices to feed its
example, will all earn the same, even though theyglobal network. It will be pertinent that firms though
may all bring different amounts of work to the firm.having a global name will have to develop a strong
But today the management of the firms is making andomestic practice and only then the merger will be
effort to evolve a hybrid system involving thesuccessful. For a transnational law firm entering a
stability of lockstep and also to rewardnew market it would be worthwhile business
entrepreneurship among partners, a percentage ofproposition to tie-up with a boutique firm as the
the share in the business they generate. This is morefundamentals of relationship and business can be
so when there are transnational mergers. Like forstrengthened and gradual exploration of the legal
instance when Clifford Chance of England mergedmarkets can be undertaken. This approach will
with Roger &Wells of United States in 2000.certainly create a long-lasting brand and effective
The enticement offered to the big money makingvalue positioning both for the local firm and for the
anti-trust attorneys of Roger &Wells wasInternational law firm.
common pooling of antitrust work of Europe andOvercoming these challenges may lead to a creation
United States, which would remain within the mergedof what can truly be characterized as a Global law
entity and lead to more challenging assignments andfirm. But can the sheer integration of global
more business for the merged entity. But the recenteconomies create a single law firm having effective
exodus of many American partners from this mergeroffices in different continents is a challenge that
suggests that this is one issue that is paramount andmany law firms are exploring and only time will be a
needs to be worked on for every partner'sbetter witness to its success.