EU Members Reject Proposal to Impose Regulating System on Any Shoe Importer

Recently, the EU members rejected the proposal ofthe 25 members of the European Union. But getting
the European Commission to impose a formal systemsuch level of approval even proves to be hard. The
that would regulate any importer of leather shoes likeCommission initially suggested the introduction of a
Vietnam and China. The scheme was designed inquota system, which would allow 95 million pairs of
order to replace emergency policies that wereimported shoes from Vietnam and 140 million from
implemented last April. It must be noted that theChina.
temporary regulating system was applied by the EUAny importer that would exceed the quota would
due to allegations that imported shoes were beinghave to pay up to 29.5% of duties. However, the
sold at lower prices in order to gain a bigger share inidea was opposed by the majority of the EU
the European markets. At that time, the Commissionmembers. The opposition was headed by major shoe
stated that it was able to gather sufficient evidencemanufacturers such as Italy, Poland, and Portugal.
that both China and Vietnam were subsidizing localMoreover, the proposed policy was questioned as
shoe businesses in order to gain an unfair advantageregard its legality under the global trade standards.
in the EU markets. According to EU TradeAfter the proposal was rejected, the Commission
Commissioner Peter Mandelson, the implementationcame up with another scheme wherein 16.5% tariffs
of a formal regulating system was needed in orderwould be imposed on Chinese goods while 10%
to protect all European manufacturers from anywould be applied on Vietnamese products. However,
importer of cheaper goods such as shoe products.that suggestion was also opposed by the EU
The proposal was supported by shoe producers inmembers. Both Germany and Britain saw the duties
member states like Italy, Poland, and Portugal.as too harsh for any importer. A spokesman of Mr.
According to them, European shoe manufacturersMandelson stated that the Commission would look
had to deal with higher production costs unlike theirfor other alternative policies that would effectively
East Asian competitors and thus could not competeprotect European shoe businesses without being too
with them in terms of pricing. However, the schemeharsh on any importer. Meanwhile, retailers welcomed
was opposed by many retailers who argued that thethe decision of the Commission. Particularly, Horst
system would force them to increase their prices, aWidmann, the head of the Federation of European
situation that might result to the decrease of theirSporting Goods Industries, said that EU members
revenues. The temporary policy imposed on anyhave realized that imposing anti-dumping duties on
importer in the EU markets is due to expire inboth Vietnam and China would not help any European
October.business. Instead, it would only put at stake the
The Commission, then, proposed a more formalinterest of consumers and the competitiveness of EU
system in order to regulate any importer from Chinamarkets, but also the credibility of international trade
or Vietnam. The policy needs at least 13 votes fromrules.