Foreign Ownership of U.S. Airlines & Ports Deemed Troubling

The United States Department of Transportationneeded when we ran out because they didn't
(DOT) on February 8, 2005, presented its decisionsupport the war."
before the U.S. House of Representatives HouseShould the Congress fail to create legislation to block
Aviation Sub-Committee, to change a rule whichthe proposed rule it would take effect, even though
would clear the way for foreign corporations to ownmost U.S. airlines with the exception of cargo carriers,
and control U.S. airlines. But members of the HouseFEDEX and UPS as well as United Airlines, having
Aviation Sub-Committee were all in agreement thatrecently reemerged from bankruptcy, are opposed
the DOT may lack the legal authority to unilaterallyto it. John Byerly, Deputy Assistant Secretary of
make such a change. Yet it does not begin to revealState has maintained that in order for the EU to
all of the implications of such a historic shift in policyapprove the Open Skies Agreement it is conditional
in bypassing the U.S. Congress in order to do so.on easing foreign ownership rules. But according to
Trade negotiations with the European Union to loosenthe Government Accountability Office, airport
up regulations in ownership of U.S. airlines is seen as acapacity limitations such as at Heaththrow would not
tradeoff by the DOT in order for the U.S. to gainbe corrected by a deregulated agreement.
greater access to landing at London's HeathrowRep. James Oberstar (D-MN), ranking Democrat on
Airport, where presently only American Airlines andthe House Transportation and Infrastructure
United Airlines have limited service there. Known asSub-Committee, in order to counter the proposed
the Open Skies Agreement, lawmakers in bothrule change introduced legislation that would require
parties believe that this proposition transcends 'freethe rule be put on hold for one year, allowing the
trade' or globalization as it becomes an issue whichCongress to review its ramifications on national
directly impacts labor and national security.defense and homeland security, which are primary
Currently, U.S. law requires that U.S. airlines must beissues which must initially be addressed.
under the "actual control" of U.S. citizens in order toAnd while possible ownership of U.S. airlines may be
be licensed for operation. And for corporations, 75%permitted within a year, control of operations and
of the voting interest must be held by U.S. citizenssecurity of six U.S. ports will be given to the United
and 66% of its board of directors and officers mustArab Emirates and based in Dubai. The London-based
also be U.S. citizens. But Secretary of Transportation,Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation Co. was
Norman Mineta, in a statement in November 2005purchased on February 13, 2006 by Dubai Ports
said that the rule change would be an "historicWorld. The deal is expected to be finalized on March
opportunity to increase travel, reduce fares, expand2, 2006. Peninsular and Oriental Steam Co. is the
commerce and bring two continents closer togetherworld's fourth largest ports company and the sale
than ever before. It provides new opportunities foraffects the commercial U.S. ports of New York, New
U.S. and European airlines, healthier competition for aJersey, Baltimore, New Orleans, Miami and Philadelphia.
growing travel market and greater connectionThe Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S.
between cities and towns of all sizes on both sides(CFIUS) is a secretive government panel comprised
of the Atlantic."of designees from the Department of Treasury, the
But the President of the Air Line Pilots Association,Department of Defense, the Department of Justice,
Intl. has a much different opinion. Captain Duanethe Department of Commerce, the Department of
Woerth testified before the House AviationState and the Department of Homeland Security. In
Sub-Committee claiming, "Changes of this magnitudeJanuary 2006, the Bush administration appointed a
should be undertaken not be an administering agencyformer Director of Operations for Europe and Latin
but by the legislative branch. Pilots spend their entireAmerica for Dubai Ports World as the new Maritime
careers accumulating the seniority required to gainAdministrator within the Department of
access to international flying opportunities. In an eraTransportation, raising more than a few eyebrows.
when the career expectations of pilots and otherBut most puzzling to lawmakers is how Dubai, which
airline workers already have been repeatedlyprovided most of the financing for the 19 hijackers
frustrated by airline bankruptcies, furloughs, wageon 9/11/2001, will now be overseeing the very port
concessions, pension plan terminations, and the like, itwhere nearly 3,000 lives were claimed that day. And
would be a crowning blow for the U.S. governmentDubai was the base for much of the terrorist planning
now to adopt a policy that would tend to eliminateand operations for the attacks in New York and
international flying by U.S. carriers."Washington, according to the FBI.
Should the new rule be adopted, with exception ofSince the Bush administration considers Dubai and the
few areas, all airline operations, including prices,UAE a vital ally in the war against terrorism, it
scheduling markets, fleet structure, marketing andapproves of the sale. However, it raises vital
alliances have the option of being controlled byquestions of U.S. national security and homeland
foreign investors. Additionally, U.S. labor lawsecurity policies at ports where presently less than
protections could be compromised and employees5% of all cargo is inspected. And having an Islamist
forced into losing out by being replaced by foreignnation in charge of U.S. ports arguably makes little in
employees. Aviation safety could be jeopardized asallowing it to dictate port operations, given that U.S.
foreign-controlled management need meet onlyports remain top terrorist targets.
minimum FAA standards, far short of the presentWith the Department of Homeland Security still
programs and practices U.S. airlines presently accord.struggling to implement systems and operations to
Surprisingly, the Department of Defense as well assecure U.S. ports, allowing Dubai to run the ports
the State Department have agreed with the DOT oncould be a gateway for contraband, weapons of
this issue. But for several Congressmen, it does notmass destruction and arsenals, as well as hiring
pass muster and especially as concerns the Civilianpractices without proper scrutiny, including the quality
Reserve Air Fleet (CRAF) which is used to transportof security which would have to conform to U.S. law.
U.S. troops including in times of war. The Open SkiesSteve Coleman, Port Authority of New York/New
Agreement would have to be redrafted toJersey spokesman stated, "We need to take a real
accommodate such. According to Rep. Peter DeFazioclose look at security before we approve such a
(D-OR), "During the Gulf War a European Unioncompany.
member didn't supply us with a type of carrier we