Globalisation: the Coup de Grace

Everyone is currently at loggerheads aboutthe zoo, those who seek public good, such as
globalisation. But who actually appreciates itsenvironmental protection, transparency, accountability,
landscape? There is nothing new-fangled aboutlabour safety, and the protection of children,
globalisation as such. It can be seen everywhere. Theultimately settle for theatrics, raising brouhaha rather
events of 11 September instantaneously echoedthan imposing change.
across the world. But more importantly, their reasons 
and effects demonstrated that in the composition ofThe Egyptian civil society: A success story
everyday life. We are without doubt side by side not"The policy of letting things alone, in the practical
just in catastrophes, but in trading, financial marketssense that the Government should never interfere
and environmental change. However, the revolution inwith business or go into business itself, is called
communications, media, and transportation systemsLaisser-faire by economists and politicians. It has
are not just embellishments. They are re-creating thebroken down so completely in practice that it is now
fundamentals of the way the world is doing business.discredited; but it was all the fashion in politics a
So, what does that mean? The service sector jobshundred years ago, and is still influentially advocated
are going to become increasingly less skilled, and theby men of business and their backers who naturally
skilled service sector jobs will become outsourced.would like to be allowed to make money as they
Education diplomas will start looking bleaker. Theplease without regard to the interest of the public."
raison d'être is that technology and globalisation are(George Bernard Shaw,1928)
breaking down educational, cultural, social, political andLast year, Canadian petrochemical giant Agrium
economic barriers that have stood for years. Thereceived the approval of the Egyptian government to
problem is not that the barriers are being torn down,build a fertiliser plant on Damietta's Ras al-Barr island,
but rather the rate with which it is happening.about 200 km from Cairo. In April, however,
Deplorably enough, the global economy at present isresidents began voicing concern over the plant's
still in fact a game of two-and-a-half players.potentially negative impact on public health and the
What’s really significant is that when you breakenvironment. Local civil society groups expressed
up the global economy into what it is, it remains thefears that factory emissions could pose a danger to
European Free Trade Area, NAFTA and Japan. Weresidents and adversely affect marine life. Growing
can then argue that in 1914 there were eight greatpublic concern about the plant's safety quickly led to
powers, now there is the G8. The differencea popular campaign against the project. Led by local
between then and now is that Austro-Hungary hasactivists, environmentalist groups and opposition
been replaced by Canada and Russia shows up asfigures, residents began staging large demonstrations
the poor guest. Thus, the global economy is stillin which they demanded the project be halted. In a
concentrated more or less around the same richdramatic show of popular opposition, Damietta
countries.households began draping their homes in massive
Even if you live on the margins of this hierarchicalblack banners reading 'No to the factory of death'.
economic order, you are still profoundly affected by                Company officials,
it. Take the African countries, for instance, when themeanwhile, hastened to vouch for the project's
International Monetary Fund and the World Banksafety. Consequently, popular pressure appeared to
shows up in to negotiate loan structures. If thetrump big business interests when parliament
country refuses to sign the loan packages on theapproved a recommendation - tabled by 59 MPs
grounds that this was a new form of colonisation.from both the ruling National Democratic Party (NDP)
These esteemed but yet lofty organisations simplyand the opposition - to relocate the plant. "This is a
leave. No agreement signed, therefore, no loans.sweeping victory for civil society in Damietta," a
The excitement over globalisation, however, hascoordinator of a popular committee that campaigned
succeeded to conceal the bona fide social andagainst the factory, was quoted as saying.
economic inequalities that are not just a surplus from 
the past, but are products of the new global            Globalisation and workers—The
economy. The promise of globalisation is just that, agood, the bad and the ugly:
promise, while globalisation itself generates newIn The Republic, Plato talks of the threat posed to a
forms of economic and political exploitation andship’s captain by a rebellious crew, “What a
marginalisation.preposterous idea to put the wheel of a ship in the
 hands of the sailors, when only the captain has the
Anti-globalisation movements, is anyone listening?expertise”. From that time to the present day
"We are looking to brands for poetry and forwe hear the same phrase reverberated: “people
spirituality, because we're not getting those thingscannot understand”. “They cannot be
from our communities or from each other." (Naomiempowered to know.” In that sense, the notions
Klein)of the "knowledge worker" and the "learning
Anti-globalisation may occur in order to maintainorganisation" are utterly incongruous.
barriers to the international transfer of people, goods                A major trend in the drive
and beliefs, particularly free market deregulation.for global economy growth is privatisation of public
Moreover, as Naomi Klein argues in her book ‘Nosector enterprises. These range from public railroads
Logo’ "anti-globalism can denote either a singleand bus lines to water works and hospitals.
social movement or an umbrella term thatParticularly hard hit are the admittedly less efficient
encompasses a number of separate socialstate sector manufacturing facilities in some weak
movements such as nationalists and socialists."economies.
These protesters’ apprehension about the 
dominance of the market economy, the freedom toWhile, from the perspective of enterprise level
accrue almost enormous wealth, the priority given toefficiencies, much of this privatisation is justified, but
consumption, brands and promised quick fixes, pointsstill removing important social safety mechanisms
to an intersection with the concerns of many in thefrom societies, as these public firms have often
developed and developing world. Their apprehensionserved as the employer of last resort and an
is that unrestrained economic power, weakimportant tool against unemployment. And these
democratic governments, politicians' selfishness, andchanges, mandated by the international financial
the endangered invasion of the public realm by largeinstitutions as part of the structural adjustment,
corporations – all defy our sense of social justiceoften are put in place without adequate, sometimes,
and democracy.without any, compensating mechanisms to protect
However, we have to agree that Davos and Portothose most harshly affected. This is resulting, in many
Alegre are part of the same world, and mustless developed states, in large "floating populations"
communicate. In their different ways, advocates ofof unemployed workers, barely surviving on minimum
the Washington consensus and the anti-globalisationpayments if at all.
movements are both materialists.            From "brain drain" to "brain gain"
Nevertheless, anti-globalisation movements do have aThe opportunity to work in developed countries is a
point in such criteria as: (1) Exploitation of foreignpriceless source of skills and experience. For those
poor workers: The decline of protections for weakerwith high state-of-the-art technical skills, interaction
nations by stronger industrialised powers has resultedwith leading researchers in the competitive
in the exploitation of the people in those nations toenvironments of the developed countries augments
become cheap labour. It is true that the workers areproductivity and innovation. What starts out as
free to leave their jobs, but in many poorer“brain drain” – a concern for
countries, this would mean starvation for the worker,governments - can be turned into “brain
and possible even his/her family if their previous jobsgain”, along with financial resources, if the
were occupied by others. (2) The shift todeveloping countries practise openness and
outsourcing: The low cost of offshore workers haveintegration with the industrialised economies.
inveigled corporations to buy goods and services                This is largely demonstrated
from foreign countries. The laid off manufacturingin the Chinese Diaspora that contributed significantly
sector workers are forced into the service sectorto the growth of south-east Asian economies.
where wages and benefits are low, but turnover isSimilarly, as India liberalised its economy, the Indian
high. This has contributed to the disappearance ofcommunity has become far more active in launching
the middle class which is a major factor in thebusiness ventures in the subcontinent and supporting
increasing economic inequality.the development of skills for ICT and high tech
(3) Weak labour unions: The surplus in cheap labourindustries. Other regions, such as Sub Saharan Africa
united with an ever growing number of companies inhave drawn much less on their human resources in
transition has caused a weakening of labour unions.the developed countries. Nevertheless, the Asian
As a result unions hold less power over corporationsexperience shows that a Diaspora can become a
that are able to easily replace workers. (4) Increasepowerful instrument for development only if
exploitation of child labour: countries that arecountries are prepared to open their economies,
experiencing an increase in labour demand due tolower the barriers to trade and capital flows and
globalisation and consequently goods produced bybegin enforcing legal and commercial rules vital to a
children will experience a greater demand for childdynamic economy.
labour. This can be both "hazardous" and                So when we discuss
“exploitive”, e.g. trafficking, forced labour,globalisation, let’s keep in mind the women who
prostitution, pornography and other illegal forms ofmake garments that are now becoming too
labour.expensive for them to wear every day. Those are
 the flesh and blood people whose fates will be
            WTO: “re-inventing thedecided, for better or for worse, by the debate over
wheel” or “mid-life crisis”??!globalisation. Will they become richer or poorer—
“The world’s poor do not resent the richwill their lives be longer or shorter— as a result of
anywhere nearly as much as the left-wing parties inwise or foolish policies? Trade policies, in fact, do not
the developed world imagine.  What they resent isaffect the number of jobs, but rather the kinds of
not having any pathways to get rich and to join thejobs people have. Globalisation has affected
flat world and cross that line into the middleworkforce demographics, as well. Today's
class.” (Thomas L. Friedman)workforces are characterised by greater diversity in
 terms of age, gender, ethnic and racial background,
Peter Sutherland, who created the World Tradeand a variety of other demographic factors. In fact,
Organisation (WTO), says “name me a countrymanagement of diversity has become one of the
that hasn’t benefited from greater access toprimary issues of 21st-century business.
free trade”. The more countries enter the WTO                Globalisation in general has
arrangements the greater their benefit will be. Inlifted living standards throughout the world. Now
which way shall we look at it? Is the WTO betterthere have been obviously some dislocations from
than what was going on before? In all fairness and sothat. If you are an American worker and your
not to be querulous, it is a less hierarchical, moremanufacturing job goes to a country in the
culpable, and more open to rapid improvements. Atdeveloping world where someone is going to get paid
the very least it forces the well-heeled to stage anone-fifth of what you're earning, then you have been
auction in front of the less fortunate. The dilemma issomehow harmed by globalisation.
with the notion that somehow this regime will benefitAt the same time, that manufacturing worker and his
all, or that it represents free trade.or her family benefit from the lower cost of goods
The WTO agreements on free trade haveand services because of falling trade barriers. And
functioned principally to prise open markets for thethey benefit obviously from all the technology that
benefit of multinational corporations at the expensehelps enable globalisation. So, globalisation is mainly a
of national economies; workers, farmers and otherplus.
people; and the environment. They should not solely                Proponents of globalisation
focus on opening markets but also allow trade to bepropagate two cases most commonly cited as
restricted to support human rights, labour rights andexamples of allegedly negative environmental effects
environmental objectives in other countries. Theof trade agreements— the “tuna/dolphin”
WTO and trade agreements should also allowand “shrimp/turtle” cases— that show a
non-government organisations a direct voice in theirrace to the top, not to the bottom, as other
governance.countries have adopted U.S. legal standards to
We cannot easily dismantle the causal relationshipprotect dolphin and sea turtles. The same is true of
between globalisation and inequality, though theworking standards. Jobs in foreign-owned enterprises
"champagne glass" approach comes really close.are usually greatly sought after, because they both
Relatively speaking, it argues that, the rich have gotpay higher money wages and offer better working
richer and the poor have got poorer. In reality, everyconditions than the domestic alternatives.
developing country, the numbers living on less than a                Globalisation is not a
dollar a day have increased over the last twopanacea. Under some circumstances it can increase
decades.the susceptibility of countries to shocks. It subjects
Globalisation has its advocates like Sutherland –states to disciplines and checks that circumscribe
for whom globalisation inherently works – and itssovereignty. A key issue in managing globalisation is
critics, the anarchist protesters – who claim thattherefore how to organise the global investment and
globalisation is intrinsically polluted and beyondlabour markets to meet the needs of flexibility for
salvation. Clearly, both approaches aren't in factenterprises, security for workers and quality for
working for everyone.consumers. We need new proactive policies that
 focus directly on how authorities in the public and
The need to be a “Global Citizen”private sphere can blend economic and social policies
“Before you finish eating breakfast this morning,with an enabling environment for private initiative to
you’ve depended on more than half thecreate market opportunities for "Decent Work".
world.” (Martin Luther King, Jr.)Thus, avaricious corporate enterprises have to be
Today, every single one of us is a 'Global Citizen',confronted with the fact that they are disregarding
whether we are conscious of it or not. Globaltheir most “valuable strategic asset” -- their
inter-dependence happens everyday. We rely onworkers.
countless different people from all over the world for 
the clothes we wear, the food we eat and the            Conclusion
technology we use. Our daily lives are constantlyFollowing a period of economic boom, a financial
affected by what people on the other side of thebubble has now burst - globally. The scope of this
planet are doing!problem has been so rigorous that some of the
We all live in a great time. The internet gives us theworld’s largest financial institutions have collapsed.
chance to come together as never before while stillThis problem could have been averted (in theory) as
reaching for our individual dreams. We also live in apeople had been pointing to these issues for decades.
time of great danger. Global problems like climateHowever, during boom, very few wanted to hear
change, dwindling natural resources, economicsuch pessimism. Does this crisis bring an end to the
recession and conflicts between nations threaten thelackadaisical forms of banking and finance? Will it
very existence of humanity. The time has come toharbinger a better economic age, or are we just
overcome our fears and prejudices. We drifted apartdestined to keep forgetting history and replicate
and forgot our shared destiny. The burden of globalthese mistakes in the future?
citizenship binds us together. So everyone of us is                Clearly, the new global
required to do more, not less! The crave to be aeconomy isn't working for workers in China, Burma,
“global citizen” is highly underestimated,Egypt or even Burkina Faso any more than it is for
craves that are vividly apparent in our everydayworkers in the United States or Europe. It is no
life,  for instance, the ‘Facebook’longer tolerated that multi-nationalists can emerge as
phenomenon.the driving force of progress, even as they
 undermine it at the workplace. How can we best use
            Civil society at its bestthe information presented thus far to amplify the
"Globalisation in its current form cannot deliver thebenefits of globalisation without ignoring the costs? 
benefits expected of it. Civil society, particularly inThe way out, is to strengthen the ability of our 21st
developing countries, must ensure that it does."century workforce to compete without having to
(Martin Khor, Director, Third World Network)deal with disproportionate share of the risks
So what does this all leave civil society? Theembedded in the dynamic, competitive global
implications of the current economic order to civileconomy..
society are substantial. On the one hand, working 
autonomously, liberated from the control of dominantThat much seems certain. This paper does not
institutions at national and global levels assumes thatattempt to convince the reader to believe in a
there is such a thing as an independent public arena.scrupulous set of arguments. Already far too many
On the other hand, co-operation with governmentsglobalisation and anti-globalisation ‘working in the
and global institutions could compromise an NGO'snew economy’ proponents preach or chant at,
image if it was believed that the capital was morerather than talk to, each other. The goal was instead
significant than the message.to expand the understanding of the scope of sound
Technically, like the United Nations, the WTO is itselfand valid arguments about the impacts of the
a creature of nation-states, together with the IMFongoing changes to the global economy. The hope is
and many other market institutions could bethat one day those who decide to act on their
considered executives of international governance.beliefs—from joining the World Bank’s team
But privatisation has deprived the nations thatto protesting at an anti-globalisation rally—will do
supposedly control it of their will, and subsequently,so with the power of knowing the complexities and
envisaged as servants rather than masters of theuncertainties of the correlation between globalisation
new global corporate sovereigns. With animals runningand the workforce.