Globalization and Civilization

In the name of Allah the Merciful Benifecentand quite advanced knowledge and culture
The civilization theorysystems.In other words it must produce knowledge
The term civilization may refer to many definitions,and culture extensively.the term ' in it's own time"
controversial and even contradicting ones , all relatedmanifests that a society is regarded civilization till it's
to society.It refers to a complex society which ispredominent and superior than the margins.Once it
distinct from primitive ones.It also means thecollapse down it's not civilization any more. The terms
humanity as a whole, a word quite synonymous tolike "Greek civilization" and"Egyption civilization" refers
culture. My intention is not to define what it is,to their past ,the time when they realy were
I’m rather seeking a name for what I havecivilizations.It would be better to call them " past
defined previously:There is at least a foremostGreek civization" and " past Eqyption civilization". In
society in a collection of interacting societies in everythis sense the Roman empire was a civilization until it
era of history.This is something clear, regarding fromwas defeated by the Islamic civilization.While the
the time when humans started to establish societies,Islamic society wasn’t a civilization untill it became
there have been conflicts among them and a societyenough powerful to defeat the Romans.
which is regarded as the most powerful,advancedThe definition also states that a civilization is a
and paramount one among these conflictingcollection of societies.A single society segrgated from
ones.It’s obvious ,the existence of such ait's collection is not regarded a civilization because it's
society is related to the settlement of humans andnot complete without complements. Thus the British
establishment of societies.It firstly manifests thatEmpire in the ninetheith century and the United
such a phenomenon is a consequence ofStates today are not civilizations seperately; instead
human’s settlement, or the establishment ofthey are both parts of it.The Roman and Byzantine
society, and secondly it entails numerous societiesempires despite being segregated were parts of one
counteracting with each other. I call such acivilization not two.They seemed to be completely
pre-defined paramount society a civilization.It’sapart from each other, while one collapsed the other
the most wise term I have found yet, and if I findsurvired for a prolonged time.
any better term , or if you have one, I will probabelyThe term " completely paramount" implies that a
replace it by that one.civilization must be superior than the marginss , this
The concise and precise definition is that a civilizationinvolves a prolonged dominancy of centuries,besides
is a complete society, or collection of societies ,it should be paramount in all aspects in all margins.
which is completely paramount and superior to it'sA predominent society, in all aspects, in comparison
margins, in the whole, in it's own time. This meansto the margins, is the limit of other societies.The
that there could be only one civilization at one time,margins must first reach and than become more
considering the margins.However, there could be twoadvanced and powerful than it.Thus in this sense the
civilizations at one time , but with distinct margins.term "civilization" is quite synonym to humanitarian
This entails the absence of any contact betweensociety as a whole.Being the representative of human
them and their marginss , even the awareness fromskills, culture,knowledge,technology and societal
each other's existince.indeed , there were more thanevolution, it comes the first in the race towards
one civilzation at one time but only under the termsadvancement and development.In this race, any
of having distinct surroundigs.If two civilizationssociety which is intended to gain power and
existed at one and had contacts which each otherparamouncy must reach the civilization first and then
they would probably conflict each other, attemptingbecome even more advanced than it.
to conquest or influence each other’sThe foremost definition is that it’s the limit of
territories.In such case the victorious one would be ahumanitarian society, as a whole.It’s the limit for
civilization.In the case of having no conflicts theboth goodness and badness.From the positive point
reason could be weak contacts which didn't led toof view it comprise of the most complex ,
any conflict, or they didn’t expand much tocomprehensive and advanced culture, it can be
conflict or influence each other. Thus the existencerefaired as the most humanitarian society.It obviously
of two civilizations is possible only by having distinctconsist of an advanced system of knowledge and
marginss, they must be large enough to avoid anyethics, which is regarded as a sign of humanity.By
conflict between them or their marginss.having complex system,and being accumulator, it
In the past there were even more than twogains all good values and cultural virtues from the
civilizations at one time.It was mostly because theymargins.On the other hand it produce values rapid
were not enough powerful and had confinedthan any other societies and thus deserves to be the
territories.By time their number reduced until the ariselimit of humanitarian society.
of Western civilization which led to one unifiedFrom the negative point of view it’s the most
margins.The western civilization is a perfect one, sincesavage, barbarian and cruel society.It’s just
it led to discovery of new worlds and unification ofbecause it’s more powerful than any other
the whole globe .Thus It's regarded as the globalsociety.It’s explainable by the theory of will to
civilization.power. Power can be used in order to kill, enslave
According to the definition a civilization must be theand terminate humanitarian society , culture and
most paramount society.If two civilisations encounterlife.The civilization is more powerful than any other
each other without having any conflict they maysociety and thus it can be cruel and savage than
incorporate becoming a unified giantother societies.in other words , since it’s the limit
civilisation.Remember in the case of being equavalentof power to other societies it’s consequently the
and conflicting each other their margins are unified.Itlimit of savageness and brutality. This can only
implies they have expanded much each one is inclineddemonstrate that it has the opportunity to be the
to expand more.In this case none of them is amost cruel.The power-vaccancy theory can tell more
civilization any more.Because no one haveabout how a civilization can be the most cruel
paramouncy.They may be considered half civilisations,society.Since, it’s the paramount society, the
since each has a paramouncy over half of margins.most power vacuum is for the civilization or, in other
The definition also implies that it is paramount in thewords, it can bring the most high power vacuum , or
whole, a society being only political or economicit’s limit, in comparison to other societies.Thus it
paramount is not regarded as one of them.It mustcan obey a more simple way than other societies in
be superior in all aspects in order to be regarded aorder to gain values from the margins.Considering
civilization.So the Mongol despite being thethat it’s a society with a high demand and
predominent empire ,in it's own time, was not adependency on the outside it’s obviously more
civilization.It was predominent politically but it was notprompted to expand via the simple way.While
complete, since it didn’t had a completeit’s highly dependant on the margins and the
predominent culture and knowledge system.Bypower vacuum brings a simple way of gathering
constrast, it deminished cultures and knowledge indemanded values from the margins , obviously it
it’s new invaded territories.becomes the most cruel society.Thus all these
The term complete society manifests that afactors make the civilization to become the pivotal
civilization must be paramount in all aspects , having acruel and savage society.
superior and autonomous economy political power,