Globalization - Economic Dimension

In simple terms, the phenomenon ofEmbodying the Results of the Uruguay Round of
‘globalization' is perceived as increasedMultilateral Trade Negotiations in April, 1994 that
inter-connectedness of the world (Papers4you.com,developed the official foundation of first real concept
2006). However there are three primary definingof borderless global economy (LeQuesene, 1996).
pillars of globalization that includes cultural, political andThe primary aim of Uruguay Round was finalizing
economic dimensions (Potter, 2002). It was arguedways to reduce tariff barriers in developed countries
that ‘cultural globalization' is increasingas well as reduce non tariff barriers like elimination of
convergence of cultural styles on a global norm, withsafeguarding, antidumping restrictions and voluntary
that norm being codified and defined by the globalexport restraint (Meredith & Dyster, 1999:291).
capitalist system. Now cultural values and norms areCurrently, WTO is a body looking after ensuring
shared and adopted among people in a way whereeconomic globalization primarily through trade
we are giving rise to one global culture. Similarly itliberalization.
was asserted that ‘political globalization' isThese attempts resulted in boom of what is known
regarding as erosion of the former role and power ofas ‘global economic convergence', that is
the nation-state.‘global integration of product' (through world's
On the other hand, Potter (2002:192) definestop manufacturing companies' global operations by
‘economic globalization' as economy whereconducting planning, production and joint research
"distance has become less important to economicwith companies of myriad nationalities and outside
activities, so that large countries sub-contract totheir home countries) and financial markets through
branchplants in far distant regions, effectivelycurrency trading, baking and loans and investment in
operating within a ‘borderless' world". Howeverbonds and equity leading towards global
Inoguchi (2001) attempted to differentiate betweenhomogenization (Kenworthy, 1997).
international and global economy. InternationalReferences
economy suggests importance of national economiesInoguchi, T., (2001), ‘The World Economy', in
working as units under national states as a result theInoguchi, T., (eds) (2001), Global Change- A Japanese
international economy concerns activities that takePerspective, Hampshire: Palgrave.
place among various ‘national economies'.Kneworthy, L., (1997), ‘Globalisation and
However global economy describes unity of globeEconomic Convergence', Competition and Change,
where geographical distance is no longer obstacle to1997, Vol 2
economic activities. It also implies aggregation of theLeQuesne, C., (1996), ‘The Uruguay Round', in
movement of goods and services worldwideLeQuesne, C., (eds) (1996), Reforming World Trade,
together with their concomitant activities includingthe Social and Environmental Priorities, Oxford: Oxfam
movement of technology information and currenciesMeredith, D., & Dyster, B., (1999), ‘International
without ‘tyranny of distance'.Economic Impacts on Australia in the 1990s', in
The economic globalization was flourished in 1990sMeredith, D., & Dyster, B., (eds) (1999), Australia In
and many examples can be taken to validate thisThe Global Economy- Continuity and Change,
argument (Papers4you.com, 2006). For instanceCambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Western European integration was first step towardsPapers For You (2006) "P/B/653. Negative effects of
economic globalization by European countries throughglobalisation", Available from [19/06/2006]
signing Maastricht Treaty in 1991 that lead to creationPapers For You (2006) "S/M/81. IN THE MIST OF
of single market in 1992 and set base for EuropeanGLOBALISATION: CLASSICAL STRATEGIC
Union that was on full operation in 1999. Similarly 12MANAGEMENT IN THE 21ST CENTURY-IS IT
members of European Community and sevenWORKING?", Available from [19/06/2006]
members of EFTA formed European Economic AreaPotter, C (2002), ‘Global Convergence,
for free trade including 380 million people andDivergence and Development', in Desai V and Potter,
accounted for 40% of world trade (Meredith &R. (eds) (2002), The Companion to Development
Dyster, 1999).Studies, London: Arnold.
How ever it was the signature on First Act