Government Intervention and the Nigerian Economy: Present, Past and Future

The global financial meltdown over the last two yearsresurgent Nigeria signed the UN Millennial Declaration
has had its predictable share of consequences on thefor universal basic human rights by 2015 and adopted
Nigerian economy, but nothing has been moreambitious plans for accelerated economic growth in a
unexpected than the impact on the banking sector.time-bound manner. A number of positive
When CEOs of the country's top banks collectivelydevelopments have occurred in the Nigerian economy
appealed last year for government intervention tosince 2001:
mitigate recessionary effects on the Nigerian financial 
environment, it was a moment of national shock. Up- Under former President O Obasanjo, the
until then, the Nigerian Central Bank had beengovernment embarked on a massive privatisation
enthusiastically assuring of the sound health of thisdrive, disinvesting in several major oil, steel, mining
sector. While none of the country's 25 major banksand port operations.
have officially asked for help, there are apprehensions- International reserves saw healthy growth from $41
that Nigeria might be tempted to take the bailout cuebillion in 2006 to well over $52 billion in 2009. The
from the US and end up partly owning some ofaverage inflation rate dropped from close to 18% in
these institutions. The global example of state2005 to 11% in 2008.
intervention in failing banks evokes grave misgivings in- Nigerian lawmakers enacted the Fiscal Responsibility
Nigeria, where banking operations were marked byBill in 2007, institutionalising the deregulation of oil
extensive mismanagement and political interference inprices. A Public Procurement Bill was also passed the
the pre-liberalisation era. The prospect of governmentsame year.
re-investment is therefore understandably upsetting- In 2004, a bank consolidation plan was executed to
for many Nigerians, and not just in the matter ofstrengthen financial institutions and improve their
banks.credit capacity for private sector businesses.
 - Nigeria's bulk of outstanding foreign debt was
For most of its existence since independence in 1960,conditionally waived off by the London and Paris
economic development in Nigeria has beenClubs, allowing for increased government spending on
determined by state planning and direct governmentpoverty alleviation programmes.
participation. Inclement policies pursued by successive 
military regimes amid the rough of tumble of Nigeria'sPerhaps the most optimistic of recent signs have
chaotic past resulted in massive macroeconomicbeen observed in the non-oil sector, which doubled
imbalances that are still inherent to Nigeria. Thesince 2001 and currently accounts for 7% of GDP.
country's historically agrarian economy wasAnother success story is the revival of agriculture
transformed almost overnight with the discovery ofand its growth to 42% of GDP by 2008. Although oil
vast oil and gas reserves, forcing a culpablecontinues to be the mainstay of the Nigerian
overdependence on hydrocarbons that eventuallyeconomy, contributing 85% of all revenues, recent
blocked economic diversification. The oil boom of thegovernments have wizened up to the idea that the
1970s brought further devastation to agriculture andcountry's tall ambitions cannot be fulfilled without
traditional livelihoods and ushered in massiverapid economic diversification. The answer, given the
unemployment and food shortages across thecountry's abundant human capital and natural
country. Human development indices had plunged toresources, is rapid business development in the SME
among of the lowest in the world by the turn of thespace. Nigeria has a great opportunity and an even
20th Century, and the ‘Nigerian Paradox' ofgreater obligation to foment an enterprise revolution
extreme poverty despite substantial national wealththat will radically transform its economic landscape.
was born. Even today, 54% of Nigeria's 148 million 
people live in extreme poverty on a daily income ofThe following are some of the broad parameters
less than $1.Nigeria must be guided by while formulation economic
 policy interventions in this regard:
Government intervention in the economy during 
military rule was mostly characterised by sporadic and- Creating a central body with responsibility to
often ill-informed policies that delivered meagre, ifcoordinate all policies relating to start-ups and existing
any, results. The IMF-funded Structural Adjustmententerprises.
Programme (SAP) of 1986 was one of the first- Creating a mass base of viable enterprises across
attempts to relax decades of economic regulation.the non-oil economy by promoting private sector
However, there was little domestic consensus onequity participation.
measures outlined in the programme and the tough- Reinforcing micro-finance institutions to enhance
market reforms that the state of the economyloan-disbursement capacity for small businesses.
demanded never really came through. Bureaucratic- Cutting down on high operating costs with tax
incompetence and corruption were largely to blamebreaks and financial incentives directed at
for this bad experience in reforms which also strainedentrepreneurs.
Nigeria's relations with international financial- Removing institutional deterrents that lead most
organisations including the World Bank. Some positivenew and emerging enterprises to operate in the
signs emerged in the mid 1990s, when tradeinformal economy.
liberalisation brought down tariff rates and import- Improving technical support for rural enterprises
dependence while opening up the economy tothat continue to operate using outdated practices.
foreign investors. Further, Abuja revoked laws- Improving entrepreneurial productivity through
allowing monopoly public sector enterprises intertiary skills development and vocational training
petroleum, telecommunications and power toprogrammes.
encourage private participation in important areas. 
These measures together helped push GDP growthGiven the vagaries of its economic history, Africa's
up to 2.5% between 1993 and 1997, reversing ansecond largest economy faces tremendous hurdles in
average decline of 2% registered over earlier years.securing a better place for itself in global rankings.
However, the recovery came at the price of lowNigeria has not had a particularly impressive track
growth in the non-oil economy, which continued torecord in terms of timely economic intervention, as
flounder amid falling demand and low liquidity.the gathering banking crisis demonstrates. What
 Nigeria needs today are aggressive, pro-active policies
The peaceful transition to civilian governance in 1999that have the full benefit of both its past
brought with it relative political stability and paved theexperiences and its future aspirations!
way for a more aggressive set of reforms. A