Impact of Food Crisis - Today and the Future, Globalization Or Protectionism?

I have been thinking about the great benefits usbeneficial? Seems like change is around the corner.
humans have been experiencing with globalization andWith the projected increase in food demand for the
trade relationships between countries. It is amazing toever growing world's population (estimated to hit 8
see how globalization is essentially changing ourbillion by 2030) and diminishing arable land, the
perception of the world and opening us to thesituation is far from being fixed or even close to a
broader scope that we were not previewed topotential solution.
before. It is great to see how different countries areHere are my thoughts. I think the situation with food
interdependent and supporting each others economy.crisis is only going to worsen. The developing and
Take for instance the economies in BRIC (Brazil,developed countries will increasingly protect their
India, Russia and China) nations. These economiesagricultural outputs for their own citizens, and
have seen significant uplift in the recent past, thanksrightfully so. With that I think that there is a potential
to developed countries such as US, Canada and EU.for major unrest in places like Africa that heavily
Much needed skills in developed nations can be founddepend on foreign aid for survival. Oxfam not so long
in these and other developing nations. A mutuallyago appealed to the world to bring awareness to this
beneficial relationship has raised the economic andincreasing crisis in Africa. Research has also shown
living standards of these and many countries.that when ever there is less arable land or lack of
While on one hand one may think these relationshipsfood (due to even lack of rain) it resulted in civil
will last for ever, one recently emerging crisis in theunrest.
world could throw a wrench in this seeminglyWhile developed and possibly some developing
amicable relationship between these countries. Believenations are well equipped to handle such crisis (for a
it or not, with the current food crisis, some countriescertain duration of course), it is the underdeveloped
may actually resort to protectionism again. A practicethat are going to face the most difficulty. In a deeply
where by countries establish certain economic policiesdestabilized world the country that is the least
where by they create trade barriers betweenfavorite is likely to have the most sufferers.
countries, be it in the form of tariffs, stopping exportIt is probably time to evaluate and test alternative
of their absolute advantage goods or by otherresources and advanced technologies that will help
means.with higher crop yield, in probably most unstable
Take for example Indonesia a once major exporterenvironment drawn by global warming. Under some
of wheat and rice. With food crisis hitting an all timevery recent and reasonable estimates the
high in recent past has stopped or limited the exportpreservation of human life would require such radical
of these items to other countries. Essentiallyinnovation and even tougher actions around the
advancing towards practicing protectionism that onceworld. These attempts are probably our best bet to
was followed only when kings ruled our world. Iaverting a potential human catastrophe. Unfortunately
wonder if this practice will creep into other countriesthis time it is likely to be triggered by lack of food, a
too?crisis that many citizens of the world have never
This begs the question, what about globalizationexperienced in their entire lives and may not be
where countries share resources that were mutuallyequipped to cope with.