Is it Time For "De-Globalization?"

Has the great globalization experiment beento believe this could be an option, but it isn't
terminated? Will it all be rolled back? And if yes, rolledsomething that I can elaborate with expertise...
back to what? Can we even imagine a de-globalizedMoving on, if the US succeeds in it's attempt to
world vividly enough to understand it's implications?force China into doing it's bidding, will it stop there?
These questions and more, are haunting bothThere are more countries that the US blames for it's
supporters and opponents of US protectionism today.economic woes. India's one of them and can very
Unbelievable as it is, protectionist voices in the US areeasily be designated a Currency Manipulator, because
gaining ground. What was once a cathedral to freepretty much like China, it is one.
markets is now turning away from it's beliefs. AndAnd Many countries in Europe believe that Germany
the reason, or so they would have you believe, isexports far more than it should to the rest of them.
alleged currency manipulation by China. TheRight now, as part of the EMU, they have no
background to this has been discussed in detail in anprotection, but the EMU isn't cast in stone. If
earlier post, China's Currency Policy, The Financialcountries could opt in, they can opt out as well. Will
Crisis and the Future of Financial Reform. In summary,protectionism result in a disintegration of Eurozone?
US Dollar purchases by China, an attempt to preventThe point is, a protectionist step by the US would
the Yuan from appreciating, has distorted the perfectgive legitimacy to protectionist forces everywhere.
markets required for "efficient globalization".And unleash a slew of legislation aimed at protecting
The solution, according to these protectionists, isdomestic economies from foreign competition. Once
de-globalization. They propose to levy a penalty ofset in motion, this movement's path cannot be
25% on all goods imported from China. In theirpredicted, or even imagined, with any degree of
opinion, this could incentivize, or force, China to stayaccuracy.
out of it's currency market, which it intervenes inAs of now, more than 130 US Senators (Democrats
consistently and on an unprecedented scale.as well as Republicans) have introduced a Bill in
The implications of this discussion go beyond just USSenate seeking levy these penalties on Chinese
and China. If the US were to label China a Currencyimports. Most of them have also signed a letter to
Manipulator, Europe won't be far behind. Lowerthe US Treasury Secretary and the US President
demand for their goods could result in the Chineseasking the administration to act against China. On April
economy contracting and force China to respond. But15, 2010 the US Treasury Department will release it's
it's ability to respond economically is limited. It is thesemi-annual report on global currency management
world's production unit and it's economic survival ispractices and it is widely expected that this report
dependent in exports so a reciprocal import penaltywill label China a Currency Manipulator. If this were to
on US goods won't serve any purpose. It is thehappen, the China Currency Manipulation Bill will gain
largest lender to the US and could sell it's holdings ofcredibility and find the bipartisan support that it needs.
US Treasuries, drive up interest rates in the US andLeaders of the group of 130 are expecting that this
then sell US Dollars to weaken it. But that would onlybill will become law by the end of May 2010. Which
mean a stronger Yuan which would be the oppositegives us just over 2 months to prepare for a strange
of what it needs to support exports. So how can itunknown world.
respond? Militarily? Opponents of protectionism Seem