Mainstreaming Fair Trade: the Role of Consumers

Mainstreaming Fair Trade: The Role of Consumersproducts. Perhaps women are more aware of the
limitations of Fair Trade products, such as
This article is based on a university research projectunavailability and higher cost.
focused on understanding the growth of Fair Trade.The 41-55 age group was most aware of Fair Trade
The term Fair Trade can be difficult to define. It is(83%), and most likely to be both aware of Fair
generally presented as an ‘ethical’ alternativeTrade and considering purchasing Fair Trade products
to conventional, or ‘free’ trade. It(63%). The findings can be related to the MORI
guarantees small scale producers a minimum price forsurvey, which identified that recognition of the
their produce, which is often defined as a fair price,fairtrade mark was highest for people in the age
or living wage. It forges a long-term relationshipgroup 45-54. Consumers between the ages of 26-40
between buyer and seller, thereby providing somefollowed in terms of awareness and purchasing
stability against market fluctuations. The Fair Tradepower. Over half, 56%, of 16-25 year olds were
Labelling Organisation (FLO) also stipulates that Fairaware about Fair Trade products, but only 19%
Trade sources have to meet minimum social andconsidered purchasing them, a relatively small
environmental criteria before being accepted for theproportion compared to other age groups.
Fair Trade certifying procedures.Relationship between age (years) and reasons for
Many Fair Trade products exist, such as handicrafts,not purchasing Fair Trade products
flowers and paper, but the main products are coffee,16-25 26-40 41-55 56+
bananas, tea and chocolate. In 2003, global sales ofUnaware/not considering purchasing Fair Trade
Fair Trade products surpassed $700 million. In 2005,products 34% 27% 9% 31%
there were 433 producer groups globally workingAgainst principle of Fair Trade 21% 11% 7% 36%
with 5 million farmers and their families, up from 360Higher Cost 30% 18% 29% 11%
in 2002. Since 2001, export prices for coffee haveUnavailability 35% 54% 86% 32%
dropped from $1.00 to $0.49c/lb, but Fair TradeUnclear labeling 5% 10% 11% 13%
coffee prices have remained at $1.26/lb, preventingOther 13% 11% 7% 9%
many small scale farmers from bankruptcy.Around 30% of 16-25 year olds did not consider
Nonetheless, Fair Trade has remained a niche market.purchasing Fair Trade products due to the expense
Consumers have the power to affect the growth ofinvolved. It is likely that younger people generally
Fair Trade products. However, this is contingent onhave less money to spend on food, linked to lower
their awareness of the inequalities of mainstreamdisposable incomes. This is probably particularly true
trade and the practices of supermarkets, so thatof the many students who live and study in Kingston.
they choose, or not, whether to promote Fair TradeConsumers in the 56+ age group were most likely to
by paying a sort of ethical premium for Fair Tradebe against the principle of Fair Trade and found
products. To better understand the current levels oflabelling and information about Fair Trade unclear.
knowledge and awareness among consumers, anPerhaps the older generation are less willing to
original consumer survey was designed and carriedchange their patterns of consumption and less sure
out at one ‘up market’ supermarketabout Fair Trade, as an alternative to conventional
(Waitrose) and one ‘down market’trade which provides conventional products. Only 9%
supermarket (ASDA) in Kingston, south west London.of 41-55 years olds did not consider purchasing Fair
The survey focuses on food as an important sectorTrade products, and 86% put this down to
of the Fair Trade market.unavailability. This implies that more aware consumers
ASDA and Waitrose target different socio-economicare more likely to see unavailability as the main
groups. According to a survey by Which magazinelimitation to the growth of Fair Trade.
Waitrose is the leading supermarket chain in the UK inThe proportion of consumers who were educated to
food quality and range. ASDA is ‘Britain’sdegree level and aware of Fair Trade was 89%,
best value weekly shop with prices that arecompared to 36% of consumers not educated to
independently shown to be lower than maindegree level. Consumers educated to degree level
competitors’ and holds the title for Britain’swere also more than twice as likely to consider
best value retailer. While ASDA and other UKpurchasing Fair Trade products (59% compared to
supermarket chains compete primarily on price and24%). While 46% of consumers who were not
try to attract customers through rewards, loyaltyeducated to degree level were unaware/uninterested
schemes and cards, Waitrose tries to build up brandin Fair Trade products, only 10% of consumers
loyalty by offering differentiated, high qualityeducated to degree level were unaware of fair
products. Thus, Waitrose can be characterised asTrade and did not consider purchasing Fair Trade
‘up market’ whereas ASDA can beproducts. Thus, a strong relationship exists between
characterised as ‘down market.’ Waitroseeducation and Fair Trade purchases. In order for Fair
holds a Royal Warrant for services, a prestigiousTrade to grow into the mainstream, consumers must
symbol. It also has activities to maintain amake an informed decision to purchase Fair Trade
‘green’ image. It was the first ever winnerproducts, which means they must understand and
of the ‘Organic Supermarket of the Year’support Fair Trade principles. Perhaps, consumers
title. Its products are also more exclusive thaneducated to degree level have a wider awareness of
ASDA’s, and tend to be more expensive.such issues. A higher proportion of consumers at
The objective of the survey was to obtainWaitrose were educated to degree level, 54%
information about consumer awareness and attitudescompared to 35% at ASDA.
towards Fair Trade and to compare Fair TradeReverting back to the main hypothesis, the Kingston
potential between the two supermarkets (ASDA andsurvey finds that high awareness and demand for
Waitrose) in relation to consumer characteristics (age,Fair Trade products exists among consumers, which
gender, education) and product characteristics (price,implies a high level of support for the principles of Fair
availability, labelling). The findings were compared toTrade. However, unavailability and higher cost of
other UK consumer research. For example, the MORIthese products are key limitations to growth of Fair
survey, May 2004, commissioned by the Fair TradeTrade. Consumer characteristics, including gender,
foundation, which found that recognition of the Fairage, and education, affect consumer awareness of
Trade mark was highest among women, 42%Fair Trade. Women tend to be more aware of Fair
compared to 35% of men, and in the 45-54 ageTrade, as do consumers between 41-55 years and
group.those educated to Degree level. At ASDA, higher
Consumers entering both supermarkets werecost seems to be the main limitation to growth. Fair
presented with a structured questionnaire. ConsumersTrade potential is higher at ‘up market’
who did not intend to purchase foodstuffs were notsupermarkets such as Waitrose. At Waitrose (and
included in the sample. Many consumers only wantedoverall) higher cost was a secondary limitation to
a paper, cigarettes or other item not available as Fairunavailability. The MORI survey, May 2004, identified
Trade. The total number of consumers was 280 (140that 63% of people who recognise the Fair Trade
at each supermarket). Interviews took place fromMark subsequently buy Fair Trade products and
February 23rd 2005 to March 1st 2005, every day ofsimilarly, the Kingston survey shows 64% of
the week between 11am-12pm and 6-7pm, to ensureconsumers who know about Fair Trade products
a better cross section of consumers. For example,consider purchasing them. This highlights the potential
sampling in the evening between 6pm and 7pmof Fair Trade and the importance of consumer
accomodated evening shoppers. The survey was alsoawareness.
piloted resulting in several improvements.One of the interesting findings of the survey was
It was hypothesised that: “Higher awareness andthat consumers make a link between Fair Trade
demand for Fair Trade products exists amongproducts and better taste and quality. There is
consumers. However, unavailability and higher cost ofevidence of the ‘turn to quality’ in the food
these products are key limitations to growth of Fairbusiness, where consumers are making informed
Trade.”purchases based on how they want food to be
The key findings of the survey are presented in theproduced and supplied to them. The trend has been
graphs below.termed ‘green consumption’ where
It was found that 56% of consumers at ASDA wereconsumers seek foods that are produced outside the
aware of Fair Trade, compared to 64% at Waitrose.agro-industrial system responsible for food scares and
At ASDA, 32% of consumers were both aware ofwidespread environmental degradation. In the UK in
Fair Trade and considered purchasing Fair Tradeparticular, this ‘turn to quality’ has been
products, compared to 45% at Waitrose. A chiconstructed around consumer concerns over health
squared test showed this difference was significantand food safety, which can be linked to a foot and
at the 5% level (v = 1). Thus, consumers atmouth epidemic, public anxiety over GM products and
Waitrose were more likely to purchase Fair Tradethe BSE crisis. Consumers may also seek to boycott
products.food from particular multinationals or countries, or to
The main reasons for purchasing Fair Trade productsconsume only locally produced or organic food or
were fairer price for the producer (33%) and betteranimal welfare friendly meat, or become involved in
taste and quality (20%). For the majority of‘community supported’ agriculture and these
consumers, both these reasons were importantconsumers are a driving force behind Fair Trade. Fair
(48%). This implies that consumers who considerTrade products, along with organic products and a
purchasing Fair Trade products are generally willing torange of natural foods, are perceived to be of better
pay a higher premium for Fair Trade products.quality and taste, which is increasing Fair Trade sales.
Interestingly, more than two thirds (68%) make aThe survey may have reflected some confusion
link between Fair Trade products and better tasteamong ‘green’ consumers between organic
quality and a fifth (20%) said they consideredand Fair Trade markets. Nevertheless, it can be
purchasing Fair Trade products solely for better tasteargued that Fair Trade may be capitalising on the
quality.success of the organic market, and that the products
Fruit was the favoured Fair Trade product (58%),overlap.
followed by coffee (51%). The favourite fruit wasFair Trade is rapidly growing as a market, with
bananas; also the UK’s most popular fruit. Coffeepowerful consumer support (as indicated by this
and fruit were by far the most popular Fair Tradesurvey and many others). In some countries, such as
products, also indicated by UK sales figure. TeaSwitzerland, Fair Trade coffee has penetrated the
(12%) and chocolate (12%) were less popular.mainstream. The success of coffee could be
Relatively few consumers were interested inrepeated for other products, including staple foods
vegetables (5%), juice (4%) and honey (1%).such as rice and potatoes. But Fair Trade is difficult
Unvailability is a main limitation to the growth of Fairto institutionalise, constrained by continuing policy
Trade, as suggested by nearly half (45%) ofdistortions in importing countries. These range from
consumers who did not consider purchasing suchprotectionist barriers on agricultural products (and a
products. Fair Trade products are limited to a handfulrange of other products), along with often
of foodstuffs in supermarkets. They are not availableunnecessarily bureaucratic regulations, which
in meat, cheese, bread and ready meals, and a rangediscriminate against small scale producers in
of other foodstuffs.developing countries.
Reasons for not purchasing Fair Trade products bySome consumer studies in Europe have also shown
supermarketthat, in general, only a maximum of 20% of people
% ASDA Waitrose Totalwould be willing to pay more for Fair Trade goods. A
Unavailability 21% 68% 45%huge majority of people would rather pay a lower
Higher Cost 40% 2% 21%price despite the negative social and environmental
Against Principle 18% 17% 18%consequences of doing so. Fair Trade is often
Unclear labeling 13% 2% 8%dismissed because of these limitations. It is also
Other 5% 13% 9%argued that Fair Trade is limited because it centres
At Waitrose, a higher proportion of consumers didon competing with conventional trade, and not
not intend to purchase Fair Trade products simplyenough on tackling the root causes of poverty and
because of their unavailability, 68%, compared tounequal power relations in trade. TransFair USA
only 21% at ASDA. The range of Fair Trade productsdescribes the benefits of Fair Trade as follows:
at each supermarket was similar, but more Fair Trade‘In a global village, we prosper as our less
fruit was available at Waitrose. Perhaps linked tofortunate neighbours prosper. Nations become
higher awareness, consumers at Waitrose wereneighbours, and we accept that some nations
more likely to realise the limitation of availability. At(‘neighbours’) are naturally more fortunate
ASDA, consumers were more deterred by higherthan others. The causes underlying global inequality,
cost: 40% of the group identified higher cost as asuch as imperialism, neo-imperialism, trade
reason for not considering Fair Trade products,advantages, and the debt crisis, disappear in this
compared to just 2% at Waitrose. Overall,quaint metaphor. The notion that natural resources
unavailability is the main limitation to the growth ofare limited, and that the first world neighbours gobble
Fair Trade (45%) and higher cost a secondaryup a disproportionate share of the global commons, is
limitation (21%).also implicitly accepted.’
The findings give weight to the assumption thatThere are many limitations to Fair Trade, and it
Waitrose caters for higher socio-economic groups,cannot be seen as an answer to root causes of
who may be more aware of Fair Trade and who canpoverty and inequality. At present Fair Trade is a
better afford such products. Waitrose consumersniche market. It only guarantees protection against
have a higher disposable income which allows then tounequal and competitive international markets to a
spend more money on food. Therefore, the potentialminority of small-scale producers in Fair Trade
of Fair Trade to grow is higher at Waitrose. If therepartnerships. However, I would argue that Fair Trade
were more Fair Trade products available, 40% ofis part of a growing social movement, and one
consumers at ASDA would still not considerpositive element of globalisation and, if growth
purchasing them because of higher cost, but atcontinues, Fair Trade will penetrate the mainstream
Waitrose, only 2% would still not consider purchasingmarket.
them due to higher cost.This article focuses on the role of consumers in
Nearly a fifth (18%) of consumers were against themainstreaming Fair Trade. Consumers are creating
principle of Fair Trade and thus did not considerdemand for more Fair Trade products, but for Fair
purchasing Fair Trade products, perhaps becauseTrade to become mainstream, economic, political and
they wer in favour of mainstreamsocial factors need to work in tandem to make
‘conventional’ trade, or completelygovernments get behind Fair Trade. Fair Trade is at
‘free’ trade. Advocates of free trade arguepresent an individual subsidy, but it should signal
that it is unfair to establish a fair price because fewerpressure for public subsidies (for the environmental
producers can capture higher prices, whereas lowand social cost of food production), so consumers
prices ensure that more producers benefit from beingare less deterred by cost. Developed countries could
paid the lower wage (although demand for Fair Tradeallow developing countries to subsidise their
products could grow so that more producers wouldproducers; open up their markets to exports from
benefit from higher wages). It can also be arguedthe developing world; and dismantle their own
that trade could become fairer by being freer i.e. noprotection. Oxfam calculates that if developing
government “interference” for efficient andcountries increased their share of world exports by
socially optimal allocation of resources. Essentially,just 5% this would generate US$350 billion - seven
developed countries could remove domestic subsidiestimes as much as they receive in aid.
which protect their producers and force small scaleA key challenge for the Fair Trade movement is in
producers in developing countries to compete on aneducating consumers in developed countries. In fact,
unequal playing field. If World Bank estimates areabout half of the extra price charged for Fair Trade
true, freer mutual trade would benefit developingproducts currently represents the cost of publicity
countries by $31bn a year. However, it has not beenand education work in the consumer market. The Fair
in the political or economical interests of WesternTrade banana is a case in point: it costs up to 40%
governments to make trade completely free (or fair).more than the “normal” banana. In other
Around 8% who did not consider purchasing Fairwords, the consumer is paying a premium to inform
Trade products mentioned that information/labellingother consumers. If Fair Trade principles and
was unclear. Fair Trade products are labelled with theenvironment and development issues were debated
Fair Trade logo, which gives consumers a tool orin schools, colleges and universities, even as part of a
brand which they can recognise, along with thenational curriculum, there would be great potential of
slogan ‘guarantees a better deal for third worldFair Trade to grow and challenge conventional free
producers.’ Thus, it is likely that this group oftrade, linked to much higher awareness of the public
consumers were referring to unclear supermarketfrom a young age.
labelling rather than Fair Trade product labels. AtPolitically aware consumers can make ethical
ASDA, 13% of the group identified unclear labelling aspurchases but also resist unfair trade practices
a reason they did not consider purchasing Fair Tradethrough citizen campaigns, pressuring governments
products, compared to only 2% at Waitrose. Atand companies to improve the social and
ASDA, it was clear that ‘conventional’environmental performance of trade. Non
products were prioritised over Fair Trade products.Government Organisations, collaborating with groups
There were many advertisements focusing on theof aware consumers can do more to place pressure
low prices of various conventional products, such ason transnational companies to participate directly in
bananas for 59 pence. It could be that theFair Trade. For example, Starbucks was essentially
bombardment of consumers by such messages notcompelled to start carrying Fair Trade labelled coffee
only appeals to their pockets, but also makes themby activists who picketed stockholder meetings and
less willing to find out about alternative productionthreatened mass demonstrations. Governments can
methods (i.e. Fair Trade products).be progressive at the national level, working with
In 2002, MORI asked people how they first becameNGOs to develop Fair Trade. In Switzerland Fair
aware of the Fair Trade logo: 43% indicated that itTrade has been relatively successful because NGOs
was while shopping; 20% said features inhave helped to educate the public, raise awareness
newspapers or magazines; and 14% cited word ofabout Fair Trade, and distribute products, with
mouth from family and friends. Therefore, becausefinancial and technical support from the progressive
labelling is clearer at Waitrose, it is more likely thatSwiss government. Linked to consumer awareness
consumers at Waitrose are aware of Fair Trade.and demand for Fair Trade products, companies have
The proportion of women who were aware of Fairrealised the profitability of Fair Trade.
Trade was 69%, significantly higher than men (46%)The time has come for businesses and supermarkets
(chi-squared: 5%, v=1). As there were a higherto realise the profitability of Fair Trade, and follow in
proportion of women in the sample, it is probablethe success and footsteps of other ‘social
that women spend more time shopping for food thanenterprises’ such as the Body Shop and Ben &
men, and develop more knowledge about availabilityJerry’s. Governments must regulate the
of products and, thus, are generally more aware ofcorporate sector so that Fair Trade is not exploited
Fair Trade than men. The findings are also supportedfor a niche market. Ironically, the time has come for
by the 2004 MORI survey, which showed thatethical corporations to take advantage in the food
recognition of the Fairtrade mark was higher amongmarket, this time with a fair outcome.
women (42% compared with 35% of men). In theThe findings of this study highlight the importance of
total sample, 40% of women were aware of Fairbetter understanding consumer preferences, and
Trade and considered purchasing Fair Trade products,raising awareness further, if Fair Trade is to continue
compared to 31% of men. Therefore, Fair Tradeto grow into the mainstream. Consumers have and
potential is higher among women. Interestinglywill play a key role in the growth of Fair Trade. Fair
though, 57% of women who were aware of FairTrade is a market and a social movement that seeks
Trade considered purchasing Fair Trade products,to resist unfair trade practices. It operates both
whereas 67% of men who were aware of Fair‘within and against the market.’ For this
Trade considered purchasing Fair Trade products. Thisreason, education and public awareness of trade
implies that men who are aware of Fair Trade areissues and the principles of Fair Trade will be
more likely to consider purchasing Fair Tradeparamount to the growth of Fair Trade.