Market Global Structure

A multinational firm's organizational structure thatEven customer service, which is the function most
reflects the "global" philosophy that the world islikely to be located closer to the customer, may have
basically one homogeneous market is called a "globalits major policies and standards set at corporate level.
structure." For example, by this philosophy, manyStructuring: A characteristic of the global structure is
large electronics and consulting firms, while allowingthat it is relatively blind to geographic distance and
for minor local adjustments to packaging andinstead focuses on one or more other strategic
language, basically project the same kinds ofdimensions-like products or markets-that it considers
products and services around the world. However,more important (than geography) to its success at
there are several differences in terminology andimplementing a global strategy.
philosophy in this field.Thus a global structure commonly has a major
First, a "global" philosophy is characterized by seeingtop-level division into product categories (generally
the world as one more-or-less monolithic market withcalled a global product structure), markets (global
similar tastes and preferences. In contemporarymarket structure), or some matrix (global matrix
parlance this is opposite to a "multidomestic" (orstructure). As an example of a global product
multinational or multilocal) philosophy by which onestructure, Procter & Gamble (P&G) has
sees the world as made up of many more-orlessthree global product divisions, namely Global Beauty,
unique markets, each with its distinct tastes andGlobal Household Care, and Global Health &
preferences. A position between these twoWell-being. However, the distinction between product
extremes is called regionalism, whereby one sees theand market structures is likely to be blurred-for
world as being made up of a small number of quiteexample, Boeing's business units seem like different
homogenous regions. These constructs can beproduct divisions (commercial airplanes, integrated
applied to industries, firms, and organizationaldefense systems, and Boeing capital corporation), but
structures, and it is informative to understand howin effect all three have the aim of marketing various
global thinking at industry and strategic levels apply.aircraft and aerospace products and services to
For example, George Yip sees globalization as adifferent market groups-in this case commercial
function of the degrees to which the globalairlines, governments, and financial intermediaries.
marketplace is fragmented, local customer needs areThe global matrix structure attempts to organize
distinct, local sourcing imperatives exist, costs areactivities by two (or more) managerial dimensions-like
heterogeneous, and trade barriers are significant toproduct, geography, and/or market. For example H. J.
cross-border commerce. Thus Randall Schuler, PeterHeinz has simultaneously geographic divisions in North
Dowling, and Helen De Cieri and other scholars referAmerica, Europe, Australia/New Zealand, and
to some industries-like commercial aircraft, copiers,emerging markets (selected countries in Asia and
generic drugs, most electronics and computereastern Europe); several product categories, namely
hardware-as global industries; while retail, the foodketchup/condiments/sauces, meals and snacks
industry, and most services are considered(including frozen foods), soups/beans and pasta, and
substantially multidomestic.infant feeding; and separate operations for retail and
Multinationals-and other large firms, for thatfood service channels. In a global structure these
matter-generally are divided into several parts, units,various departmental and business divisions may have
or divisions that reflect some aspect of theirnecessary aspects of local focus, but essentially they
strategy. This link between structure and strategywork together for implementing the firm's global
was made famous in the classic book Strategy andstrategy.
Structure by Alfred DuPont Chandler. For example, aProcesses: Finally, and very importantly, structure
firm with five product categories may have beenimplies processes such as coordination, integration,
structured into five divisions, each division mandatedand information systems. These processes tend to
to manage one of the product categories. Chrisbe pronounced in the global structure, and generally
Bartlett and Sumantra Ghoshal build on this logic asvery common in contemporary organizations.
they focus on organizational responses to global andKwangsoo Kim and Jong-Hun Park identify four
local forces; and they describe four organizationalgeneric integrating mechanisms: (1) people-based
types (or mentalities) for the global organization thatintegrating mechanisms that use people to coordinate
represent organizational and strategic responses tobusiness operations across borders, involving the
various industry contingencies. For example, theytransfer of managers, meetings, teams, committees,
describe the global firm that views the world as itsand integrators; (2) information-based integrating
market, assumes that national tastes are more similarmechanisms use information systems such as
than different, and that believes in standardizeddatabases, electronic mail, Internet, intranet, and
products; and these strategic approaches requireelectronic data interchanges to integrate business
structural integrative mechanisms that are tooperations across borders; (3) formalization-based
coordinate worldwide activities, production, marketing,integrating mechanisms rely on the use of
research and development (R&D), and planning.standardized or common work procedures, rules,
Thus, it is these structural processes that are impliedpolicies, and manuals across units; and (4)
by the term global structure. Mechanisms All largecentralization-based integrating mechanisms retain
organizations need some structures that coordinatedecision-making authority at the corporate
and integrate to some degree. However, the globalheadquarters-a similar concept to that in the "locus of
strategy relies on these structures forstrategic responsibility" section above.
implementation There are three major aspects to thisThe more global the firm, the more it uses these
kind of structure. The first is the locus of strategicprocesses. Intel, for example, uses relatively few
responsibility. Second, the way the structureformal structural mechanisms, but several cross
separates reporting relationships and dictates howfunctional teams-including information technology (IT),
the firm is divided. This aspect of structure may beknowledge management, human resources, finance,
called structuring. The final aspect is the kinds oflegal, change control, data warehousing, common
coordination and integration systems-these may bedirectory information management, and cost
called processes.reduction teams-as integrating processes that allow
Locus of strategic responsibility: A crucial aspect ofthem rapid adaptation to changing conditions.
organization structure is the extent to which decision-Integrating mechanisms can also have negative
making autonomy is delegated from corporateeffects-perhaps tying the hands of local managers,
headquarters to parts of the business. In the globalimposing compliance costs (both time and other
firm there is a strategic imperative to centralizeresources), and creating unintended bureaucratic
important strategic decisions. For example, decisionsbarriers to efficient decision making. A study by
on product range, research and development,David Brock and Ilene Siscovick, for example, found
branding, and human resource management tend toeffects of integrative factors at subsidiary level were
be made at corporate rather than subsidiary level.often negative.