Nafta, Cafta, or Shafta - a.k.a. |Shafted|

Most people when they hear the word NAFTA, think...Today the United States, Mexico, and Canada
NAFTA, CAFTA, or SHAFTA (as in shafted), butembark together on an extraordinary enterprise. We
that's only because they don't know the completeare creating the largest, richest, and most productive
history of the North American Free Trademarket in the entire world, a trillion market of 360
Agreement.million people that stretches 5,000 miles from Alaska
With Secretary of Commerce and Industrialand the Yukon to the Yucatan Peninsula. NAFTA, the
Development Jaime Serra Puche and President CarlosNorth American free trade agreement, is an
Salinas of Mexico, U.S. Trade Representative Carla A.achievement of three strong and proud nations. This
Hills, and Minister of International Trade Michael Wilsonaccord expresses our confidence in economic
and Prime Minister Brian Mulroney of Canada at thefreedom and personal freedom, in our peoples'
initialing ceremony for the North American Free Tradeenergy and enterprise. The United States, Mexico,
Agreement in San Antonio, TX, October 7 [1992].  and Canada have already seen the powerful and
Source:  National Archives and Recordsbeneficial impact of freer trade and more open
Administration - Public Papers of the Presidents ofmarkets. Over the past 5 years, as President Salinas
the United States George H.W. Bush: 1992-93, Bookreduced trade barriers under his bold reform program
II, Photographic Portfolioand as Prime Minister Mulroney and I implemented the
By Patricia L Johnson and Richard E WalrathUnited States-Canadian Free Trade Agreement, trade
When we think about NAFTA, most of usbetween our three countries has soared. In 1992
automatically think about two things, Bill Clinton andalone, that trade will reach an estimated 3 billion, up
lost jobs.  Most people when they hear the wordbillion just since 1987...
NAFTA, think NAFTA, CAFTA, or SHAFTA (as inHis full speech may be read at the following link at
shafted), but that's because they don't know thethe George Bush Presidential Library.
history.  Bill Clinton has consistently received bothThe Clinton administration promoted the free trade
praise and criticism for the North American Freeagreement between Mexico and Canada and NAFTA
Trade Agreement and little credit for job creation.would never have been passed without the
The fact is there were 23.1 million jobs created duringoverwhelming support of the Republican members of
Bill Clinton's eight years in office, but the increases inCongress.
payrolls during his tenure have been offset by theClinton was for free trade between the three
loss of jobs in the George W. Bush [Bush 43]countries, and NAFTA would be good for the US if
presidency due to foreign trade.the price of crude oil hadn't skyrocketed over the
Is Bill Clinton responsible for these job losses?  Thepast seven years. 
answer is absolutely not - for two reasons. The U.S. International Trade report released February
The losses we are experiencing in labor markets are14, 2008 indicated a 2007 trade deficit with Canada
losses due to cheap labor rates in India, China andof $64.2 billion, The increase in imports from Canada
other overseas countries, not due to the Northwas primarily due to crude oil and pharmaceuticals. 
American Free Trade Agreement.We're also running a 2007 trade deficit with Mexico
Second, the North American Free Trade Agreementof $74.3 billion, for probably the same reason. 
was a twinkle in the eye of Ronald Reagan as can beMexico and Canada are our two biggest non-OPEC oil
determined by the following statement made duringsuppliers.
his speech announcing his candidacy for President inHowever, neither of the countries in NAFTA can
1979.even begin to compare with the $256.3 billion trade
"It may take the next 100 years but we can dare todeficit with China for 2007.  No crude oil was
dream that at some future date a map of the worldimported from China during 2007.
might show the North American continent as one inThe question that should  be asked on NAFTA is
which the people's commerce of its three strongwho would benefit the most from the North
countries flow more freely across their presentAmerican Trade Agreement IF the United States
borders than they do today."was not so dependent upon crude oil as an energy
The Canada-United States free trade agreement,source? 
CFTA, went into effect on January 1, 1989 and wasThree Presidents, Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush,
eventually incorporated into NAFTA duringand William J. Clinton promoted the idea over a period
negotiations by the George H.W. Bush (Bush 41)of almost thirty years. 
administration.What has not been taken into consideration is the
Following is an excerpt made by President Georgedevastating effect the increased price of oil would
H.W. Bush during the initialing ceremony for NAFTA. have on trade balances between the three
This speech was made October 7, 1992 - a monthcountries.  Just over the past 12-month period of
before Bill Clinton was elected to office and threetime, imported petroleum prices have increased
months before he took office.66.9%.  NAFTA is good, crude oil dependence isn't.