Piracy - US Presidential Order on payment of ransoms and recent developments

At the time of writing the shipping and marinepirates on board, but they are just foot soldiers
insurance industries are still trying to digest andemployed to guard the ship. The "investors" ashore
understand the full ramifications of the US Presidentialwho form the committees that control negotiations
Order signed on April 13th 2010.are shadows, whose identities can only be guessed
Confusion reigns, which is unsurprising in the face of aat.
lack of written clarification from the US State orFor non-US entities problems may arise where cargo
Treasury Departments. The fact that aor other interests are being asked for a contribution
non-attributable, off the record briefing took place onin GA or other indemnity to cover the ransom and
Friday 16th April has been widely reported, but givenancillary costs from companies with a US nexis. US
that the criminal sanctions include a twenty yearinsurers and companies will not make payment
prison sentence and the civil sanctions a fine twicewithout clearance from the relevant US Treasury
that of the value of the transaction, the industryDepartment (OAFC). It is unlikely that the intention of
(especially those with any type of US nexus) can bethe US government was to give US interests a public
forgiven for approaching the payment of ransoms orpolicy type defence to all payments that may be
the indemnification of owners who have paiddeemed to be funding a ransom. That would be
ransoms with anything other than absolute caution.protectionism at its worse and would severely affect
In what must have been a co-ordinated initiative thethe US insurance market's ability to write marine or
US and the UN Sanctions Committee (whose rolespecialist policies that may cover ransom payments.
includes naming designated groups and individualsThat would impact not only on K&R insurance,
under UN Resolution 1844) both issued lists on 13but also hull and war cover where ransoms may form
April naming Al Shebab as a group and nine otherslegitimate sue and labour and General Average costs.
described as members of Al Shebab or similar groups,We would hope that the Order will be explained and
whose activities (in the language of both theclarification given and are optimistic that the
Presidential Order and Resolution 1844) undermine theramifications of this may not be as wide reaching as
security and stability of Somalia. The US went furtherthey first appear.
and named two men said to be connected withOther Developments
piracy, an activity that the US Order expresslyRecent IMB headlines suggest that piracy incidents
stated as undermining Somalia's security. Why theseare decreasing. Applied to Somalia that is surely
two men were singled out is unclear. There aremisleading, given that half the reported cases took
others whose prominence in the piracy world is alsoplace off east Africa. January and February gave
widely reported who, for the moment, have slippedsome cause for comfort but the levels of activity for
through the net.March and April are now in excess of the
Those designated by the UN are to have their assetscorresponding period of last year. Attacks are taking
frozen, and are forbidden to travel. Whilst the USplace further south and further east than have
Order makes similar sanctions against those namedpreviously been seen. Indeed, this is fast becoming
on its list, the effect on those wishing to pay apiracy off India with the last attack on a tanker being
ransom or give support to those needing to pay aat 68 degrees East. In the last few days at 69
ransom is less clear. The Order makes no specificdegrees East two fishing vessels were taken, some
reference to ransoms and the US authorities say350 miles off India. It will be interesting to see if this
they remain sympathetic to owners caught up in aleads to a reaction from the War Risk Committee
hijacking and who are forced to pay a ransom toand whether the Additional Premium (AP) area is also
release, in particular, their crew. The aim, it is thereforpushed further East. The AP area is moved to take
said, is not to prevent the payment of ransoms, butinto account new pirate activity but the pirates react
to lay the groundwork to bring action against thoseto that by moving their operations to the east of
who may be supporting piracy. We can expect,that line. Vessels are running out of sea and it would
surely in the future, further names to be added tobe interesting to know how many ships other than
the list. Although it is understood that those namedthose calling at Somali ports have been attacked and
will only be pirates or terrorists, the Order does nothijacked whilst in the AP area as it existed at the
make this clear.time of the attack.
This is very much a US issue and anyone involved inThe military has begun to take the fight to the
a hijacking must take US legal advice, but picking uppirates but a greater appetite to arrest pirates
on the issues and common themes reported in thecoincided with Kenya making it clear that it had taken
press and by US legal commentators, it seems that aits share and would accept no more. At one stage
ship owner with no US nexus can pay a ransom, asthe French had forty pirates on board one of their
long as it is not paid to one of the designated peoplenaval vessels, who were distributed between
or groups. In respect of Al Shebab, given its namingPuntland, Seychelles and Kenya (the last to be
as a terrorist organisation by the US, this is nothingallowed in). The Dutch Marines received well-deserved
new. In the UK anti-terrorist legislation means that noplaudits for their recapture of the German flagged
payment can be knowingly made to a terroristTaipan, with special forces fast roping onto the
organisation which has committed a violent act,vessel when the pirates were on board. The crew
particularly one involving fire arms, where the acthad retired to a citadel and the Dutch placed
was motivated by politics, ideology or religion. Nothemselves back under national control in order to
direct link (in terms of funding) has been establishedcarry out the attack, thereby circumventing the
between the pirates and Al Shebab, but it remains tomore bureaucratic central command of EUNAVFOR. It
be seen whether the industry remains prepared tois thought the pirates captured in this incident are
make payments or indemnify those that makebeing sent to Germany for prosecution.
payments directly to the pirates. The move by theThe last quarter also saw the capture of another
US to name piracy as an activity undermining SomaliVLCC, the Samho Dream with a second tanker
security seems to have altered the landscapeevading capture with the use of an armed security
completely.team. There is no doubt attitudes on the use of
Implicationsarms on board are hardening as the industry faces up
Insurers (and especially those with US connections)the fact that no ship has been taken where armed
still reeling from the severity of the Iranian sanctionsguards have been deployed. But there has also been
should approach this latest Order with caution.the first reported shooting of a pirate by a private
Fundamental to falling foul of the Order is if paymentsecurity company raising again the spectre of
goes to one of the designated people. But forescalation. So far the pirates have shown no willing to
owners and insurers the question is how do youuse anything other than the AK 47 and an RPG and
know if the ransom is going to one of the designatedit is to be hoped that this will not change. The rescue
people? What level of due diligence will the USof the crews of the Taipan and the Moscow
authorities require? In practical terms it is nigh onUniversity show that the use of citadels can have a
impossible to know with any certainty to whom asuccessful outcome, but these are dependant on
ransom is being paid. Pirates rarely use their realthere being a military force nearby. Again, this brings
names and often hide behind nicknames. That can bea risk of escalation. The stakes remain high for all,
seen in the US list where Mohammed Abdi Garaad isnot least the crew who bear much of the risk to
named. Garaad means "white beard", which forensure trade gets through. With over two hundred
obvious reasons is unlikely to have been bestowedbeing held the final thoughts should be with them and
on him by his mother. Even the translators employedtheir families and for Rachel and Paul Chandler who
by the pirates use generic names like Ali orwere taken on their yacht in October 2009 and still
Chermake and will change them from ship to ship.await release.
Beyond this the crew may learn the names of the