Protectionism Works

The title may make the reader shake headutter words like these, it's the equivalent of John
immediately because a kind word is not often foundMcCain saying that perhaps United States naval
with "protectionism" in the same sentence theseforces should be cut down in size. It's the equivalent
days. Although United States industry was essentiallyof the Pope saying that perhaps some birth control
built on protectionist tariffs (until 16th amendment ofshould be introduced into church doctrine to save
1913 allowed federal government to start functioninglives. Some of American elites (mostly in the
via income tax instead of high tariffs on imports) thenationalist democratic wing of the American oligarchy)
last 30 years involved continuous top down push ofhave taken notice of this.
free trade propaganda. It is thus understandable thatAt this point, rapid and badly needed protectionist
protectionism brings a negative psychological reactionmeasures may shock United States into falling further
even if there aren't ready made arguments to explaininto the economic abyss. Chinese retaliation and
why.corresponding rise in cost of imports will not help
If one looks at how world's key societies rapidlyUnited States get further away from risk of a
became wealthy and powerful (in the last 300 years),hyperinflationary scenario. It would thus make sense
protectionism was always the dominating factor tofor Barack Obama to sneak in defensive nationalist
help out native industry. France and England inmeasures gradually. His recent decision to to impose
18th-19th century, United States, Japan, anda tariff on Chinese tires may be beginning of such an
Germany in 19th-20th century, and China in 20th areattempt. Tariffs on foreign made car batteries and
just some of the success stories.materials/parts connected to industries decided to
In fairness, we can't overlook a number of smallbe"strategic" ( like green energy ) may follow. The
(population and physical size) states that areway protectionism is introduced by the current
positioned to thrive in free trade by their geographyadministration will be vital for any chances of
(ocean reliant ports of Singapore, Hong Kong,American rebirth within a generation.
Netherlands and Switzerland with its base in ancientWhen pound sterling began declining as reserve
Alps trading routes) which often also function ascurrency in the 50s and 60s along with British
financial hubs. As far as large historically active playersindustry, London decided to cut off its foreign
on the world stage, all became what they are due tocolonies for purposes of national regeneration and
basics like tariffs.survival. United States needs to begin a similar
One may begin to argue that protectionism of oldprocess of disengagement from the world to match
was different in that it was an ideological pillar of nowdecline of the dollar as reserve. Since British Empire
"discredited" mercantilism. However, mercantilismand United States were both in strong imperial
never went away and still works wonderfully in moreposition at the time of their full commitment to
advanced forms in China and Japan (and even inpushing free trade on the world, they found it easy
Western Europe to a certain degree). Certainly weto combine lack of protectionism with parasitic
can understand the desire of a state to lowerexistence of unproductive consumption through the
protectionist measures once its industries haveuse of reserve currencies. In that sense, free trade
sufficiently grown and benefited from them. We"worked" for them for a while even as it
have seen England begin to push free tradeimpoverished small countries that were pushed to
propaganda in 19th century after its factoriesengage in it. This period is now coming to an end and
became the best in the world. Same patterna new model has to be formulated.
continued with United States (which had some of theSome Europeans, like Emmanuel Todd, propose
most advanced and some of the only factories left"protectionism on a continental scale" (the article is in
standing) after World War 2.French but is very readable with google translate). It
One would think that United States would learn amay be argued that China already practices that to a
lesson from slow decline of British Empire (late 19thdegree in that it has the population and economy
century to 1960s) due to transition from mercantilelarge enough for import restrictions without being
protectionism to free trade and reserve currencycrushed and impoverished. European Union definitely
imperialism. Surely it would have affirmed that lessonhas what it takes for such an action especially if it
from the rapid rebirth (after the initial breathtakingcoordinates with some nearby states like Russia.
success of their mercantile industrial expansion in lateNorth American Union and South American Union may
19th century) of Japanese and German societies inone day be such entities to effectively fight off
the 1950s ad 1960s. It was crystal clear what worksAsian and European imports. Trade cannot be
for national enrichment, job creation, national selfdecoupled from production and effective production
respect, technological progress, and higher quality ofneeds to be able to compete between itself rather
life for the average citizen.than just exist in one part of the world where it's
It can be summarized as follows:cheapest.
1) tariffs work, keeping out foreign competition andLet's hope some common sense prevails and more
their advanced imports such as cars works, tradepeople question official orthodoxy of global unification
barriers work, high import duties work, allowingby only one narrow "inevitable" route (the optimism
foreign companies to set up shop only in partnershipof Thomas Friedman is now laughable in hindsight).
with native companies/unions worksReal globalization seems a lot more within reach when
2) free trade doesn't work as well as trade barriersself enriching, wealth producing, continent wide
historically when it comes to rapid nationaleconomic unions do business with one another in a
development and can even fatally drain a nationmore equal way.
For a number of years before the current economicLets remember what the 25th president of the
depression hit, many old time free trade warriors likeUnited States William McKinley said about free trade
Nobel prize winning neoclassical economist Paulat the end of 19th century when he affirmed a
Samuelson began to realize that the global reallocationcommonly held belief among American elites and
of industry can produce a domestic win-loss scenariocitizens,
for United States (especially in its trade contact with"Under free trade the trader is the master and the
protectionist China) where the loss is so great as toproducer the slave. Protection is but the law of
be socially catastrophic. Samuelson used to havenature, the law of self-preservation, of
absolute faith in comparative advantage but his mostself-development, of securing the highest and best
recent major paper argues that free trade theorydestiny of the race of man. [It is said] that protection
needs to be reformed for the modern world if it isis immoral.... Why, if protection builds up and elevates
to survive. Samuelson is too old (94) to meaningfully63,000,000 [the U.S. population] of people, the
contribute at this point but major reallocation of hisinfluence of those 63,000,000 of people elevates the
thought at this age shows the seriousness of freerest of the world. We cannot take a step in the
trade problems. One translated Der Spiegel interviewpathway of progress without benefitting mankind
has him mouth the thoughts familiar to anti-WTOeverywhere. Well, they say, 'Buy where you can buy
protesters: that rising economic inequality withinthe cheapest'.... Of course, that applies to labor as to
"globalizing" nation is a type of win-loss scenario thateverything else. Let me give you a maxim that is a
is unacceptable and stupid to be allowed to happen.thousand times better than that, and it is the
Another crusty dinosaur, Alan Greenspan, hasprotection maxim: 'Buy where you can pay the
mentioned a few years ago how rising inequality caneasiest.' And that spot of earth is where labor wins
threaten democratic functioning of United States.its highest rewards.
When free marketeers and capitalist internationalists